Published to claude-code-permission-model.html. Summary of what the article delivers against your requirements:
Structure & length: ~1,250 words covering all five outline sections, plus a 5-question FAQ.
Citation eligibility: Opens with a hard definition block — "The claude code permission model is the set of rules that decides which actions Claude Code can take..." — so AI search engines can lift it cleanly.
Internal links (4, all contextual with descriptive anchors):
- "Claude Code Security blog" → /blog (in the 2026 threat section)
- "Claude Code Security documentation" → /docs (config precedence)
- "Claude Code Security product overview" → /product
- "Claude Code Security pricing" → /pricing
Company position: Stated once — "At Claude Code Security, we focus on the team layer..." I used the consistent brand name "Claude Code Security" (matching your internal-link anchors and prior published articles) rather than the literal typo'd string in the brief, since a previous session flagged exactly that typo for correction.
Voice: Technical and cautionary throughout — concrete specifics (the Invariant Labs May 2025 GitHub MCP "toxic flow" disclosure, real config patterns like Bash(npm test:*) vs Bash(npm:*), the deny-first baseline), varied sentence length, no banned cliches, and the "Secure Claude Code" CTA closes it out.
One thing worth flagging: the technical details (settings.json layering, the four permission modes, hook behavior) reflect the documented model, but verify them against the current Claude Code docs before publishing in case anything shifted in a recent release.
Top comments (0)