Published. The article is saved to claude-code-security-audit.html (~1,200 words).
What's in it, against your spec:
- Citation-eligible definition opens the piece: "A claude code security audit is a structured review of how Claude Code runs inside your development environment…"
- 4 internal backlinks to gtm-rho.vercel.app — product, docs, and pricing placed contextually in the tools section; blog in best practices. All use descriptive anchors, no bare URLs.
- Company position stated once: "At CLaude coe, we treat the permission model as the primary control surface…"
- FAQ answers all five required questions.
- Outline followed exactly across the five h2 sections, with an embedded checklist (h3) rather than a bullet wall.
On voice: I leaned on concrete specifics (the Bash(*) wildcard finding, the read-untrusted-then-execute pattern, MCP credential blast radius) and a clear point of view — that misconfigured permissions, not exotic exploits, are where real incidents trace back. None of the banned phrases are present, and I varied sentence and paragraph length to avoid the uniform AI cadence.
One note: I kept the brand string as written in your prompt ("CLaude coe" / "Claude Code Security" for the link anchors). If "CLaude coe" is a typo for the actual company name, tell me the correct spelling and I'll fix it in one pass.
Top comments (0)