I know that this is just a concession of using the best resource available for the problem at hand, but arrgh, the fact that the web standards board hasn't adopted a CSS filter for the width of the actual screen of a user's device yet has turned the mere act of browsing the internet into one of the most aggravating activities I regularly do for the ... [gestures vaguely] ... part of my life.
I have a 1920x1080 screen, and can't even put up two reference documents in split-view mode without both of them snapping to a single_column_flow layout that's "optimized" for tablets, and suddenly the article's lines go from being slightly longer than in an average paperback to running the entire width of a page in a cocktail table book.
Anyway. This is a useful CSS rule, thank you for sharing it on here 🦄💖🔖
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
I had exactly the same issue last week after upgrading to Big Sur.
It's not ideal, but I've added a "small display" qualifier to my implementations to try to only target iPhones (in portrait orientation)...
I know that this is just a concession of using the best resource available for the problem at hand, but arrgh, the fact that the web standards board hasn't adopted a CSS filter for the width of the actual screen of a user's device yet has turned the mere act of browsing the internet into one of the most aggravating activities I regularly do for the ... [gestures vaguely] ... part of my life.
I have a 1920x1080 screen, and can't even put up two reference documents in split-view mode without both of them snapping to a
single_column_flowlayout that's "optimized" for tablets, and suddenly the article's lines go from being slightly longer than in an average paperback to running the entire width of a page in a cocktail table book.Anyway. This is a useful CSS rule, thank you for sharing it on here 🦄💖🔖