"A registrar that costs $10 will let you do whatever you want and will ignore and laugh at any legal request."
The modern internet, often percei...
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
The "$10 registrar that laughs at legal requests" is a threat-intel pipeline on its own. The useful output is rarely the list of abusive registrars; it is the velocity: which ones absorb domains from a campaign right after the first takedown attempt.
Do you publish the underlying data (a CSV of registrar/ASN pairs would be plenty)? I would gladly cross-reference it with the phishing kits I dissect. Those two views together tend to show the money path.
The internet deserves better stewardship than this.
If these claims are true, regulators must take immediate action.
The DNS layer is critical infrastructure, abuse here affects everyone globally.
NiceNIC needs to respond transparently to these allegations. Silence is not acceptable.
How can IANA-assigned entities escape accountability for so long?
Cybercriminals thrive where oversight is weak, this looks like a textbook case.
This explains why so many malicious domains stay online for months.
DNS abuse is not a technical issue alone, it is an ethical failure.
Victims of phishing and scams deserve answers and protection.
Hosting crime under the cover of neutrality is not neutrality at all.
If enforcement existed, global cybercrime losses would drop drastically.
Security researchers have been warning about registrar abuse for years.
This is deeply alarming. DNS providers should protect the internet, not enable cybercrime.
Turning a blind eye makes a provider complicit.
DNS registrars must be held to the same standards worldwide.
Cybercriminals always go where enforcement is lax.
One weak link can poison the entire internet ecosystem.
This is a wake-up call for ICANN and IANA partners.
Transparency reports should be mandatory for registrars.
Abuse-friendly infrastructure undermines global digital safety.
Accountability is the only way forward if trust is to be restored.
End users pay the price while criminals stay protected.
Ignoring abuse reports is not ignorance, it is a choice.
Victims of phishing and this should be investigated by cybercrime agencies.
This should be investigated by international cybercrime agencies.