Originally published at devtoolpicks.com
Every SaaS boilerplate promises the same thing: stop wiring up auth, payments, and email from scratch and start building your actual product. The pitch is real. Auth alone takes 20+ hours if you're doing it properly. Add Stripe webhooks, email templates, an admin panel, and a landing page and you're looking at 80-100 hours before you've written a single line of business logic.
The question isn't whether a boilerplate is worth it. For most solo developers, it clearly is. The question is which one fits your stack, your project, and your budget.
ShipFast at $199 is the NextJS option. Larafast at $169 and SaaSykit at $179 are the Laravel options. Here is what actually matters when choosing between them.
Quick verdict
| Boilerplate | Price | Stack | Best for | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ShipFast | $199 one-time | NextJS, React, Tailwind | NextJS developers who want the fastest launch | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| Larafast | $169–$199 one-time | Laravel, TALL or VILT | Laravel developers who want stack flexibility | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
| SaaSykit | $179 one-time | Laravel, TALL (Livewire) | Laravel developers who want built-in SaaS metrics | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ |
The first decision is not ShipFast vs Larafast. It's NextJS vs Laravel. Pick the boilerplate that matches the framework you already know. Switching frameworks to use a boilerplate is never worth it.
If you're a NextJS developer: ShipFast is the default choice in its category.
If you're a Laravel developer: Larafast and SaaSykit are both strong, with different trade-offs.
ShipFast: the NextJS standard
ShipFast was built by Marc Lou, one of the most prolific indie hackers in the space. He's shipped 27+ products using it, which means it's been tested in production across dozens of different use cases rather than built as a demo project.
Price: $199 one-time, unlimited projects.
What you get:
- NextJS App Router (JavaScript and TypeScript options)
- Auth: Google OAuth, magic link email login, protected API routes
- Payments: Stripe (subscriptions and one-time) + Lemon Squeezy
- Database: MongoDB or Supabase (PostgreSQL)
- Email: Mailgun and Resend
- UI: Tailwind CSS components, pre-built landing page, SEO blog
- Community: 8,000+ active users, 5,000+ in Discord
The community is genuinely the differentiating factor. At 8,000+ users, most integration edge cases have already been solved and documented in the Discord. When you hit a problem combining Supabase auth with Stripe webhooks at 2am before your launch, there is probably a thread about it.
The documentation is detailed. Setup to deployed SaaS with real auth and billing reportedly takes under a day for most developers.
Who should use it: NextJS developers who want to ship fast and don't want to figure out boilerplate architecture decisions from scratch. Marc Lou uses this for every product he ships, which is the strongest possible evidence that it works in real production scenarios.
The honest con: ShipFast is deliberately minimal on features beyond the boilerplate essentials. There's no multi-tenancy, no built-in team management, no SaaS metric tracking. If your product needs team workspaces or complex subscription analytics, you'll be building those yourself. ShipFast is also a NextJS product. Deploying to Vercel is the natural path, which adds ongoing hosting costs at scale that you don't have with a self-hosted Laravel VPS.
Larafast: the Laravel indie hacker pick
Larafast occupies the same market position as ShipFast but for Laravel developers. If you're a PHP developer and the TALL or VILT stack is your natural environment, this is the equivalent starting point.
Price: $169 one-time (TALL stack) or $199 (VILT stack). One purchase, unlimited projects.
What you get:
- Laravel with TALL stack (Tailwind, Alpine.js, Livewire, Laravel) or VILT (Vue, Inertia.js, Laravel, Tailwind)
- FilamentPHP admin panel (user management, subscription management, blog, settings)
- Payments: Stripe, Lemon Squeezy, Paddle
- Auth: email/password, Google OAuth, social login
- SEO tools and blog system built in
- Landing page components ready to go
The dual-stack choice is Larafast's clearest advantage over every other Laravel boilerplate. If you prefer Vue with Inertia.js you get that. If you prefer Livewire you get that. No other Laravel starter kit gives you the option at purchase. This matters because switching stacks mid-project is expensive, and choosing between Livewire and Vue/Inertia is a real decision point for Laravel developers.
FilamentPHP is the dominant admin framework in the Laravel ecosystem in 2026. Getting it pre-configured with user management, subscription controls, and a blog resource saves several days of work.
Three payment providers out of the box is also worth calling out. Stripe for US/EU founders, Lemon Squeezy for MoR simplicity, Paddle for digital goods. You can pick based on your situation without writing integration code.
Who should use it: Laravel developers building SaaS products who want to launch quickly without rebuilding the same auth/billing/admin setup for every project. Particularly valuable if you ship multiple products per year and want one solid foundation to reuse.
The honest con: Larafast is maintained by a solo developer, which means feature additions and bug fixes depend on one person's availability. The community is smaller than ShipFast's (340+ developers compared to 8,000+). For straightforward use cases this doesn't matter much. For edge cases and complex integrations, you're more likely to be on your own. Documentation quality is solid but not as comprehensive as ShipFast's.
SaaSykit: best billing intelligence for Laravel
SaaSykit is the other serious Laravel contender. It's built on the TALL stack with FilamentPHP like Larafast, but with one feature that stands out: built-in SaaS business metrics.
Price: $179 one-time, unlimited projects.
What you get:
- Laravel + TALL stack (Livewire, AlpineJS, Tailwind)
- FilamentPHP admin panel
- Payments: Stripe, Paddle, Lemon Squeezy, and Creem
- Built-in MRR, churn rate, ARPU, and trial conversion dashboards
- Multi-tenancy version available separately
- Fully translatable (i18n out of the box)
- Comprehensive automated test coverage
The SaaS metrics dashboard is the reason SaaSykit exists as a separate product from Larafast. Out of the box, you can see your MRR, churn, ARPU, new vs churned revenue, and trial conversion rates inside the FilamentPHP admin. Building something equivalent from scratch takes time and you'd typically pay $49/month to a tool like Baremetrics for the same visibility. SaaSykit builds it into your own codebase.
Creem support is also notable SaaSykit is the only boilerplate on this list that supports Creem as a payment processor alongside Stripe, Paddle, and Lemon Squeezy.
The test coverage is another genuine differentiator. Most SaaS boilerplates ship with minimal testing. SaaSykit documents its test coverage across critical components, which matters more as your product grows and you start refactoring core features.
Who should use it: Laravel developers who are building a product they plan to run seriously for multiple years, where understanding your subscription metrics from day one matters. Also the right choice if you need multi-tenancy (team workspaces with seat-based billing), which SaaSykit Tenancy handles.
The honest con: No VILT option. You get TALL only. If your preferred Laravel frontend is Vue with Inertia.js, Larafast is the better fit. The community is smaller than both ShipFast and Larafast in terms of public presence. The $179 price puts it between the two and the feature set justifies it, but only if you'll actually use the metrics dashboard.
Head-to-head: what actually matters
Framework lock-in: This is the real decision. ShipFast is NextJS. Larafast and SaaSykit are Laravel. Choose based on your stack, not on feature lists.
Payment provider coverage: SaaSykit wins with Stripe, Paddle, Lemon Squeezy, and Creem. Larafast covers Stripe, Lemon Squeezy, and Paddle. ShipFast covers Stripe and Lemon Squeezy.
Admin panel: Both Laravel options use FilamentPHP, which is the right choice in 2026. ShipFast has no dedicated admin panel you'd build or integrate one yourself.
Community: ShipFast wins decisively at 8,000+ users. This translates to faster answers to edge case questions and a larger ecosystem of plugins and extensions built on top of it.
Deployment cost at scale: ShipFast on Vercel means your hosting bill grows with traffic. Laravel on a VPS (your own Hetzner or DigitalOcean server with Laravel Forge or Ploi) gives you more predictable costs and more control as your product grows.
Built-in SaaS metrics: SaaSykit is the only option with MRR/churn dashboards out of the box. For everyone else, you're adding this later.
Multi-tenancy: SaaSykit Tenancy is the only one with a dedicated multi-tenant version. ShipFast and Larafast don't include this.
How to choose
You're a NextJS developer: ShipFast. There's no serious Laravel-equivalent in the NextJS space with the same community size and production track record. The $199 is worth it for the Discord alone.
You're a Laravel developer who prefers Vue/Inertia.js: Larafast VILT at $199. The stack flexibility is the key feature and nothing else on this list offers it for Laravel.
You're a Laravel developer who prefers Livewire and wants SaaS metrics built in: SaaSykit at $179. The billing intelligence dashboard pays for itself the first time you're trying to diagnose why your churn is spiking.
You're a Laravel developer, Livewire is fine, and you're shipping multiple small products: Larafast TALL at $169. The lower price and solid foundation make it the right call for high-volume product shipping.
You need multi-tenant SaaS (team workspaces, seat billing): SaaSykit Tenancy. Nothing else here handles this out of the box.
FAQ
Is a SaaS boilerplate actually worth $169-$199?
If you're billing your time at any professional rate, yes. The setup work a boilerplate replaces auth, payments, email, admin panel, landing page takes 60-100 hours to build properly from scratch. Even at $25/hour, that's $1,500-$2,500 in time saved. The boilerplate cost is irrelevant at that scale. The real question is whether the boilerplate fits your stack and project requirements.
Can I use these boilerplates for client work?
All three are one-time purchases with unlimited project licenses. You can build multiple projects, including client work, without additional licensing fees. Verify the specific license terms on each product's site before commercial client deployments.
ShipFast vs just using a NextJS starter template from the official docs?
The official NextJS docs provide auth and basic Stripe setup, but you're assembling it yourself. ShipFast gives you auth, payments, email, a landing page, a blog, and UI components pre-integrated and tested across 27+ real products. The free option works if you have time. ShipFast works if you don't.
What if Larafast stops being maintained?
This is a real concern with any solo-maintained boilerplate. Larafast gives you the full codebase you're not locked into a service, just a starting point. If maintenance stops, your existing projects keep running and you own all the code. The risk is that future Laravel version compatibility updates may require your own work rather than a simple update pull.
Do I need to know Laravel well to use Larafast or SaaSykit?
Yes. Both are for developers who already work in Laravel. They're not for learning Laravel they're for skipping the setup work that Laravel developers do repeatedly across projects. If you're new to Laravel, spend time with the framework first before buying a boilerplate.
Bottom line
The boilerplate decision is mostly a stack decision. NextJS developers should look at ShipFast first. Laravel developers should decide between Larafast and SaaSykit based on whether the VILT stack option or the built-in metrics dashboard matters more to their next project.
All three are legitimate time-savers for solo developers who ship real products. None of them replace the need to build your actual product they just eliminate the month of setup work before you can start.
Building your Laravel SaaS stack? Also read: Laravel Forge vs Ploi vs Coolify: Which Should Solo Devs Use? and Lemon Squeezy vs Stripe vs Paddle for Solo Devs.
Top comments (0)