I couldn't get this to work in v11, it seems something has changed with how the property editor configuration is parsed.
The base TagsValueConverter expects the editor configuration to be an instance of TagConfiguration however you get a Dictionary<string, object> using a package.manifest with 'prevalues' approach. This results in an invalid cast exception in the base class when trying to figure out what storage type has been used.
The workaround is to register the 'Data only' tags editor via C# class by inheriting from TagsPropertyEditor.
e.g:
[DataEditor("Umbraco.Tags.DataOnly", "Tags", "tags", Icon = "icon-tags", ValueEditorIsReusable = true)]
public class TagsDataOnlyEditor : TagsPropertyEditor { //... }
The base TagsPropertyEditor ensures the configuration object is created in the correct format.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
I couldn't get this to work in v11, it seems something has changed with how the property editor configuration is parsed.
The base
TagsValueConverterexpects the editor configuration to be an instance ofTagConfigurationhowever you get aDictionary<string, object>using a package.manifest with 'prevalues' approach. This results in an invalid cast exception in the base class when trying to figure out what storage type has been used.The workaround is to register the 'Data only' tags editor via C# class by inheriting from
TagsPropertyEditor.e.g:
[DataEditor("Umbraco.Tags.DataOnly", "Tags", "tags", Icon = "icon-tags", ValueEditorIsReusable = true)]public class TagsDataOnlyEditor : TagsPropertyEditor { //... }
The base
TagsPropertyEditorensures the configuration object is created in the correct format.