DEV Community

Ansh Dhanani
Ansh Dhanani

Posted on

Shipping Faster in Full-Stack Development (2026) with AI Orchestration

Why it matters?

lets say we have two guys. Where one is a giga chad coder guy who writes all code by himself and if he get stuck he just see docs. second is my type of guy who is a vibe-coder but not any other vibe-coder a Efficiency-level-V vibe-coder (I'll tell you why).

so here is a thing, when they both start a big project. the giga chad starts from scratch and write everything which is not a bad thing also he knows every whys of his code, but after all this talk about giga chad if you see at the other one, he had already completed 90% of project with all best practices.

how did he do that?

that's what you'll learn in this blog later.

so who is better?

there was a time when AI was not that impactful and people said its better to write slow and by own than from an AI assistance. but time is changed now yesterday an "open source model Kimi k2" by Moonshot AI just released and benchmark said it even better than claude opus 4.5. let me remind you claude opus 4.5 is a devil of coding complex logic.

so, what i'm trying to say is, if you really know how to orchestrate this models you can actually ship products faster and more importantly robust.

here's how you can do it too.

if you are a college student, you can get github pro using you college id and use some monthly free premium credits of claude sonnet 4.5 for free (thanks github). it also give other models but claude sonnet 4.5 is best among them.

now you have claude waiting to be used.

Lets dive into the best practices i used for best results.


Point 1: learn how to prompt efficiently.

when i was in early stage of learning ai agents for coding, i used to tell chatgpt "hey chatgpt fix this error." back then, it wasn't even able to get the problem to start with.

as i keep playing with it i come to know that you have to give full context about the problem or the thing you it to do. you have to keep in mind you have to give one prompt in which you have to write the clear problem and what path to follow and what not to too.

for example:

bad one:
“Fix the backend bug.”

Better prompt (structured):
“In our Express + Prisma backend, the POST /users endpoint fails when email already exists. Prisma throws a unique constraint error. We want to return a 409 response instead of crashing the server. Suggest a fix and include proper error handling patterns.”

remember to give full context weather it is about the error on browser console, typescript error ,compilation fails, refactor (very problematic) everything that you think it should know about everything. as a developer you must know how every thing works and why you choose what and all. you can't just let it do anything it wants, it will be just another useless slop and waste of credits.

you should utilized each and every feature of you IDE. many people says cursor is better. let me tell you i have tried cursor, windsurf, lazy vim, emacs(Salute to those who use this), Jetbrain(nice one) and of course my personal favorite VS code. and i can tell you that it doesn't actually matters that much.

talking about vs code features, you must use include files or folder in prompt feature(present in most IDEs) you want to change. you must be aware what you are give access, turns out you just expose your .env secrets and now openai asking you for 2421$ lol. also there are bunch of nice extentions which are very useful, you can check that out too.

Point 2: Never start from scratch.

if you are in any hackathon or starting any projects by your own (here i'm not talking about yt toutorials projects).

IT IS BETTER TO START WITH TEMPLATE.

you might be thinking that this is laziness. but let me tell you something, lazy smart coders are the best category of coders. They are the one who find short and best pathways using their laziness. funny but its fact.

so, you might ask me Ansh where can we find clean templates for starters,
as a developer if we talk about nextjs specifically, vercel have pretty nice templates. but you can find you perfect match from github too (i know it is little slow process but sometimes you can get a gem).

I’m participating in a hackathon at IIT Gandhinagar with my team, and we needed to create an admin dashboard for our problem statement. What I did was use a ready-made shadcn admin dashboard template. I then used Claude Desktop and connected it with Desktop MCP, writing a big prompt that detailed everything we wanted in a markdown.md file — basically everything about the problem, the tech stack, and the libraries to use. I kept an eye on it to make sure nothing went wrong. Now we have a clean project that doesn’t break.

Use Librarys.

let's say you have a very nice project you working on, and you have to add a feature, the problem is you don't know how to do it.

depending upon size and complexity of the feature, you sometime might not need any library, but if you have a big feature and you are supposed to handle many states at ones or anything complex, you must use a library rather than just asking ai to impliment it. it happens with me countless times that i asked it to implement a simple feature and it create all hooks and library fuctions inside component file, while i am having a separate clean structure to handle both types of files, but the ai doesn't know about my folder structure at all it just know that one component.

conclusion

The giga chad's way works for adding critical features to already going projects.

For project foundation and clean start you must follow efficient vibe coder way.

Thanks for reading.

Top comments (0)