it doesn't create any conflicts, you can check the demo :)
and well it's open source, so i would be extremely happy if you contribute your ideas, cause prepare-commit-message is a smart thing to implement as an option
But you had to do a git pull --rebase which, it would seem, wiped out the original commit, probably because it's now empty. If you'd done just git pull, without the rebase, you'd have a conflict.
All this rewriting of history after it's been pushed to a public remote repo seems pretty messy.
no bro, if you do pull --no-rebase it's same, no conflicts are there because opencommit doesn't change any code, only message. SHA becomes different, but git doesnt create any conflicts you would need to solve, because code is same.. all good :)
Do your docs have any before and after graphic of how the Action changes the branch commits?
My first reaction was the same, that this would create a problem with my local branch being 1 commit ahead and behind the remote, but I don't think I understand what the Action is actually doing.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
it doesn't create any conflicts, you can check the demo :)
and well it's open source, so i would be extremely happy if you contribute your ideas, cause
prepare-commit-messageis a smart thing to implement as an optionBut you had to do a
git pull --rebasewhich, it would seem, wiped out the original commit, probably because it's now empty. If you'd done justgit pull, without the rebase, you'd have a conflict.All this rewriting of history after it's been pushed to a public remote repo seems pretty messy.
no bro, if you do
pull --no-rebaseit's same, no conflicts are there because opencommit doesn't change any code, only message. SHA becomes different, but git doesnt create any conflicts you would need to solve, because code is same.. all good :)Do your docs have any before and after graphic of how the Action changes the branch commits?
My first reaction was the same, that this would create a problem with my local branch being 1 commit ahead and behind the remote, but I don't think I understand what the Action is actually doing.