That's one hell of a reply my guy. Seriously well put, and thought through. I've pleaded my case and how I feel about Go, its ups and downs. I may come to change my mind many times while developing in Go.
Also I'd absolutely suggest (if you haven't already) to turn this into your own post. Throw in some digestible counter arguments and examples. I'd love to read it!
My jab, above, is clearly biased. And the pro-Go 'hype' is really the comment sections, mostly. Expected.
But Go, admittedly, IS a vector properly pointed. It's compiled, not to some bytecode goop for the Ponderosa vm, but a real binary! Some of this hype is deserved.
Thus, I've every intention of investigating Go. I've stamped my approval on the trial and use of it for one of our mobile back-ends. God help us, we are now a Gopher company.
Go may hold the minor mystery I seek, even if used just as a glue language. That is, I'm somewhat embarrassed by my heavy use of PHP's exec(myprogcpp params). I would 'mask' that if I could, and without CGI. And I don't want to re-engineer PHP through extensions, which as I understand, requires something third party, anyway (Zend API).
So, exec() is the skeleton in my closet. But it works so well! Some of my in-house database programs skirt the need of embedded script (almost entirely) by tucking html in C++ strings. Absolutely no external .html or .php views. Love it. But for team projects, my front-end guys would kill me!
TreeFrog C++, with its bloated MVC may hold some answers. I may play with it, again, this weekend. (BTW, out of everything hyped in Internet development, Model/View/Controller is king!) If I can come up with something more elegant than exec(prog params); foreach($output...); THEN I'll consider writing that post. Cheers! ))
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
That's one hell of a reply my guy. Seriously well put, and thought through. I've pleaded my case and how I feel about Go, its ups and downs. I may come to change my mind many times while developing in Go.
Also I'd absolutely suggest (if you haven't already) to turn this into your own post. Throw in some digestible counter arguments and examples. I'd love to read it!
Appreciate it! I'd say yours is the best impartial blog I've come across. And there is Murray,
murrayc.com/permalink/2017/06/26/a...
...at which I've glanced.
My jab, above, is clearly biased. And the pro-Go 'hype' is really the comment sections, mostly. Expected.
But Go, admittedly, IS a vector properly pointed. It's compiled, not to some bytecode goop for the Ponderosa vm, but a real binary! Some of this hype is deserved.
Thus, I've every intention of investigating Go. I've stamped my approval on the trial and use of it for one of our mobile back-ends. God help us, we are now a Gopher company.
Go may hold the minor mystery I seek, even if used just as a glue language. That is, I'm somewhat embarrassed by my heavy use of PHP's exec(myprogcpp params). I would 'mask' that if I could, and without CGI. And I don't want to re-engineer PHP through extensions, which as I understand, requires something third party, anyway (Zend API).
So, exec() is the skeleton in my closet. But it works so well! Some of my in-house database programs skirt the need of embedded script (almost entirely) by tucking html in C++ strings. Absolutely no external .html or .php views. Love it. But for team projects, my front-end guys would kill me!
TreeFrog C++, with its bloated MVC may hold some answers. I may play with it, again, this weekend. (BTW, out of everything hyped in Internet development, Model/View/Controller is king!) If I can come up with something more elegant than exec(prog params); foreach($output...); THEN I'll consider writing that post. Cheers! ))