I would rather have my code reviewed by someone who has experienced a longer time with the codebase, because sometimes the logic I write to solve a particular problem was already solved in some refractored helper that is not obvious to you, or the same logic is written somewhere else, and these could be refractored in a suitable helper.
Agree, that knowledge about such utilities help, but that should not be a must have quality of the reviewer. Unless, of course, your codebase has legacy code or too much custom non-standard implementation.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
I would rather have my code reviewed by someone who has experienced a longer time with the codebase, because sometimes the logic I write to solve a particular problem was already solved in some refractored helper that is not obvious to you, or the same logic is written somewhere else, and these could be refractored in a suitable helper.
Agree, that knowledge about such utilities help, but that should not be a must have quality of the reviewer. Unless, of course, your codebase has legacy code or too much custom non-standard implementation.