Overview
In the historical period in which we live, the frontend world is saturated with frameworks: Vue, React, Angular, just to name t...
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
Astro is a great choice when you have a lot of static content. The ability to use different framework's components is also immensely helpful for migrations. However, if neither of those are the case, it is merely overhead.
Absolutely true!
Astro was born to avoid unnecessary JavaScript use.
It's their philosophy!
I absolutely love Astro. I recently created a YouTube tutorial series called Canva to Astro, converting a canvas template to astro 4. Absolutely great framework.
Thanks for the article
Thank you for the introduction βΊοΈ
Question π€ Why is it a frontend framework when the emphasis is on shipping zero JS? (Which I think is great btw)
I'm getting very confused with the naming out there recently.
Hi!
it was a pleasure!
Regarding your question, I can tell you that although an Astro project in production does not use JavaScript unless necessary, during development this language is present and is part of many constructs!
For this reason it can be considered a frontend framework.
I really like Astro, I haven't tried it yet but I'm planning to use it for building some side-projects page! Still, great article, gives a nice overview of Astro and now really feel even more like build something with it!
Thank you @giuliano1993 for feedback β¨
Astro is amazing tech for frontend developer.
Try it, it's simple!
Great for building jam powered websites. Nice work
jamstack.org/
π
Developers can be female too.
Is Astro similar to Ruby on Rails and Django? Sounds like a throwback to server rendering of static HTML, with accommodations for JS.
I don't know if Astro is similar to Ruby on Rails or Django, because I don't know these technologies, but you might be right about the second part.
ohhοΌthat is goodοΌ
Thank you!