Great article. I would add: It makes sense to follow actual vs predicted time for the various features and, first and foremost the global tasks (e.g. overhead, unit tests) this helps in improving and fine-tuning the estimations over time (maybe unit tests take me 25% and not 20% on average).
Great article. I would add: It makes sense to follow actual vs predicted time for the various features and, first and foremost the global tasks (e.g. overhead, unit tests) this helps in improving and fine-tuning the estimations over time (maybe unit tests take me 25% and not 20% on average).
Great tip and very useful.
Thank you very much!