We have not agreed to that at all. As in Dijkstra note you linked, ALGOL and Pascal indices start at 1. This is also the case with XSLT/XPath/XQuery.
I don't understand why you are trying to blame index-0 on Dijkstra. His note was written in 1982, years after languages like C were defined. Dijkstra did not set the rule on where to start. Just because he voiced his reasoned opinion on a subject does not give him the blame for what others did.
Besides, the natural world also starts at 0. When you are born you are in your first year, which is from 0 to 1. This confusing problem is everywhere, not just in programming languages.
“Should array indices start at 0 or 1? My compromise of 0.5 was rejected without, I thought, proper consideration.” - Stan Kelly-Bootle
Again, I agree all the way that this problem is confusing! The entire point of this article is that certain conventions are not always intuitive. That doesn't mean they're bad. It just means there should be a good reason for them.
Also, I'm not saying that Dijkstra is the reason for indexing from 0, but he's clearly made the strongest case for it. There's been less time between the first programming language and what Dijkstra said (24 years) than what he said and today (37 years). He's had an incredible influence on the field in the last 40 years.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
We have not agreed to that at all. As in Dijkstra note you linked, ALGOL and Pascal indices start at 1. This is also the case with XSLT/XPath/XQuery.
I don't understand why you are trying to blame index-0 on Dijkstra. His note was written in 1982, years after languages like C were defined. Dijkstra did not set the rule on where to start. Just because he voiced his reasoned opinion on a subject does not give him the blame for what others did.
Besides, the natural world also starts at 0. When you are born you are in your first year, which is from 0 to 1. This confusing problem is everywhere, not just in programming languages.
Again, I agree all the way that this problem is confusing! The entire point of this article is that certain conventions are not always intuitive. That doesn't mean they're bad. It just means there should be a good reason for them.
Also, I'm not saying that Dijkstra is the reason for indexing from 0, but he's clearly made the strongest case for it. There's been less time between the first programming language and what Dijkstra said (24 years) than what he said and today (37 years). He's had an incredible influence on the field in the last 40 years.