A space to discuss and keep up software development and manage your software career
An inclusive community for gaming enthusiasts
News and discussion of science and technology such as AI, VR, cryptocurrency, quantum computing, and more.
From composing and gigging to gear, hot music takes, and everything in between.
Memes and software development shitposting
Movie and TV enthusiasm, criticism and everything in-between.
Discussing AI software development, and showing off what we're building.
A community for makers, hobbyists, and professionals to discuss Arduino, Raspberry Pi, 3D printing, and much more.
Web design, graphic design and everything in-between
Discussing the core forem open source software project — features, bugs, performance, self-hosting.
For engineers building software at scale. We discuss architecture, cloud-native, and SRE—the hard-won lessons you can't just Google
A collaborative community for all things Crypto—from Bitcoin to protocol development and DeFi to NFTs and market analysis.
You've probably seen this image before, but this is what 100% code coverage can look like:
It even passes all tests.
This is what will happen when you make high code coverage a strict requirement for developers.
Error: Expected an instance of W, got M instead.
According to the posted dashboard the assertion held up, so it must have been a W which was received.
I hadn’t seen this, thank you for sharing :)
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
You've probably seen this image before, but this is what 100% code coverage can look like:
It even passes all tests.
This is what will happen when you make high code coverage a strict requirement for developers.
Error: Expected an instance of W, got M instead.According to the posted dashboard the assertion held up, so it must have been a W which was received.
I hadn’t seen this, thank you for sharing :)