I appreciate seeing the more complex side, but complex pseudo-code isn’t the focus of the article, and presenting it as the first example makes the reader think the complex stuff is what pseudo-code -really- is— and that the simpler example is just “dumbed down”.
Maybe it would help if the examples were used in a different way? Like, “pseudo-code can be simple [example] or complex [example], but it’s overall goal is to...”
Thanks for the article! It answered a few questions I had 😊
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
I see both sides here.
I appreciate seeing the more complex side, but complex pseudo-code isn’t the focus of the article, and presenting it as the first example makes the reader think the complex stuff is what pseudo-code -really- is— and that the simpler example is just “dumbed down”.
Maybe it would help if the examples were used in a different way? Like, “pseudo-code can be simple [example] or complex [example], but it’s overall goal is to...”
Thanks for the article! It answered a few questions I had 😊