By the end of this guide, you’ll understand not only what makes a true browser-native P2P database possible, but why it matters.
For developers building the next generation of web applications, the promise of a truly peer-to-peer (P2P) architecture is the ultimate goal: real-time collaboration, offline-first functionality, and resilience without costly, centralized servers.
But the journey to find the right “P2P database” is a treacherous one. The landscape is a confusing maze of protocols, libraries, and databases, many of which carry a legacy from a server-first world.
This guide is a developer’s map through that maze. We will start with the broad universe of distributed data technologies, apply a strict filter to find what is truly viable for modern, browser-native applications, and ultimately discover the solution that meets today’s demands for performance and security.
Step 1: The Great Filter — Separating Protocols from Products
The first challenge is that many technologies listed as “P2P databases” are actually low-level protocols or libraries, not integrated database solutions. They provide the building blocks but leave the hardest parts — storage, querying, and conflict resolution — to the developer.
Let’s apply our first filter: Is it a complete database, or a state synchronization library?
- Libraries like Yjs, Automerge, and Trystero: These are brilliant CRDT and P2P communication libraries. They are exceptional at synchronizing the state of a JSON object or a text document in real-time. However, they are not databases. They don’t provide a persistent storage engine or a query API out of the box.
- You still need to build your database on top of them, often by pairing them with IndexedDB.
Our quest is for a complete, out-of-the-box database. So, while these libraries are a crucial part of the ecosystem, we’ll set them aside for now.
Step 2: The Browser-Native Filter — Node.js vs. The Web
The next, and most critical, filter is: Can it run entirely within the browser, without a required Node.js runtime or backend daemon?
This is where the majority of powerful distributed technologies are eliminated for our specific use case.
- Technologies like Hypercore Protocol (with Hyperbee), BigchainDB, and KappaDB: These are powerful, server-first P2P technologies. They are designed to run in environments with full filesystem and network access, like a Node.js server. While it’s sometimes possible to bridge them to a browser via WebSockets or WebRTC relays, this introduces a centralized component and complexity that violates our “truly P2P, browser-native” requirement.
- They are not designed to be initialized and run directly and solely from a user’s browser tab.
After applying these two strict filters, the vast landscape shrinks dramatically. We are left with a handful of contenders that have genuinely attempted to solve the browser-P2P database challenge. This is where the real comparison begins.
Step 3: The Old Guard — A Look at the Pioneers
Two names have dominated this space for years: GunDB and OrbitDB. They were groundbreaking and laid the foundation for what was possible. Let’s analyze them with a modern developer’s perspective.
GunDB: The Resilient Veteran
GunDB is a legend. It was one of the first to offer a truly serverless, P2P graph database that runs in the browser.
-
Strengths:
- Truly Decentralized: It achieves P2P communication without mandatory servers, a remarkable feat.
- Resilient: Its CRDT-inspired approach to conflict resolution makes it robust.
-
Modern-Day Challenges:
- Mature Architecture: Built with earlier JavaScript conventions, the codebase may require some adaptation for developers accustomed to modern tooling and workflows.
- Performance Considerations: In high-throughput scenarios, its resource usage may require careful tuning, especially for performance-sensitive applications such as VR or real-time gaming.
Verdict: A pioneering technology that proved the concept, but its architecture shows its age. For new projects demanding peak performance, it presents significant hurdles.
OrbitDB: The IPFS-Powered Log
OrbitDB takes a different approach, building on the ambitious IPFS (InterPlanetary File System).
-
Strengths:
- Immutable Data: Its event-log structure is excellent for applications requiring a full history of changes.
- IPFS Integration: A natural fit if your application is already invested in the IPFS ecosystem.
-
Modern-Day Challenges:
- Heavy Dependency: js-ipfs, the browser implementation of IPFS, is notoriously resource-intensive, increasing bundle size and memory usage.
- Browser Limitations: The browser version of IPFS often relies on gateway servers or has persistence issues, compromising the “truly P2P” ideal.
Verdict: An interesting choice for IPFS-native apps, but its heavy dependencies and browser performance issues make it a difficult recommendation for general-purpose web apps.
“These systems proved what was possible — but the web itself has evolved. Today’s browsers, APIs, and performance expectations call for a new foundation.”
Step 4: The Paradigm Shift — Introducing GenosDB
After exploring the strengths and limits of earlier solutions, it becomes clear that a new generation of P2P databases needs to approach the browser differently — one that blends performance, simplicity, and resilience by design.
GenosDB is a distributed, real-time graph database built for the modern web from the ground up. It doesn’t compete with the pioneers — it builds on their lessons.
How GenosDB Evolves the Model
Performance by Design: GenosDB employs debouncing as a first line of defense against transmission overload. Instead of relying on cascading ACK chains like in GUN’s mesh, it manages load proactively — coalescing writes, batching network operations, and balancing disk I/O. This prevents backpressure before it occurs, keeping both peers and the UI responsive under heavy load.
Modern Persistence: By using the Origin Private File System (OPFS) for high-throughput, non-blocking storage, GenosDB achieves the performance of native databases directly in the browser, with zero external dependencies.
Efficient Communication: The WebRTC-based sync layer was rewritten for predictable behavior and low overhead, avoiding redundant message floods through a debounced task pipeline.
Compact & Secure: Data is serialized with MessagePack and compressed with Pako, ensuring minimal footprint over the wire. A built-in Security Manager (SM) brings RBAC and WebAuthn support for a zero-trust environment — something older P2P databases never had to tackle directly.
Developer Experience: Its modular, asynchronous design makes it approachable yet powerful. The graph API supports advanced recursive traversals and reactive queries out of the box.
“Here’s a quick summary of how the leading P2P databases compare in focus and strengths.”
GunDB
- Vibe: The Resilient Pioneer.
- Best For: Simple, decentralized apps where resilience is key and performance is not critical.
- Watch Out For: Legacy architecture, potential performance issues, and unpredictable states in complex apps.
OrbitDB (with js-IPFS)
- Vibe: The IPFS-Native Log.
- Best For: Applications deeply integrated with the IPFS ecosystem that need an immutable history.
- Watch Out For: Heavy performance overhead, large bundle size, and browser-related complexities of IPFS.
GenosDB
- Vibe: The High-Performance Modern Successor.
- Best For: New, demanding web applications requiring real-time collaboration, high performance, modern security, and a superior developer experience.
- Key Features: OPFS storage, built-in RBAC + WebAuthn, lightweight P2P layer, advanced graph database built with a Zero-Trust Security Model
Choosing the Right P2P Database
GunDB remains one of the most important milestones in the journey toward a decentralized web. Its community, perseverance, and years of experimentation proved that a peer-to-peer database could truly run in the browser — long before most believed it was possible.
GenosDB was built from the ground up to redefine data synchronization on the web through its innovative GenosRTC protocol.
It takes a different approach — a modular, top-level-await factory design — where every layer, from the storage engine to the real-time network flow, is engineered to remove the bottlenecks and assumptions that have constrained peer-to-peer systems for years.
Driven by an obsession with speed, stability, and simplicity, GenosDB delivers a truly modern architecture — built for today’s web and ready for what comes next.
This article is part of the official documentation of GenosDB (GDB).
GenosDB is a distributed, modular, peer-to-peer graph database built with a Zero-Trust Security Model, created by Esteban Fuster Pozzi (estebanrfp).
📄 Whitepaper | overview of GenosDB design and architecture
🛠 Roadmap | planned features and future updates
💡 Examples | code snippets and usage demos
📖 Documentation | full reference guide
🔍 API Reference | detailed API methods
📚 Wiki | additional notes and guides
💬 GitHub Discussions | community questions and feedback
🗂 Repository | Minified production-ready files
📦 Install via npm | quick setup instructions
Top comments (0)