Jordan Ngatikaura's Post-Divorce PDA: What Public Romance After a Five-Year Marriage Reveals About Shame, Attachment, and the "Fiat Love" Trap
The photo cycle is by now familiar. Jordan Ngatikaura, the Secret Lives of Mormon Wives figure who filed for divorce from his estranged wife Jessi Draper in March after five years of marriage, was recently spotted packing on the PDA with a new woman, per Page Six. The internet has done what the internet does inside the hour. Picked a villain. Picked a victim. Posted screenshots side by side. Diagnosed him from a phone.
I want to step out of that lane entirely.
I have been a Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist for sixteen-plus years. I have never sat clinically with Jordan or Jessi, and the Goldwater rule keeps me out of the diagnosis business anyway. What I can do is name the pattern I watch unfold in my office almost every week, in less famous form. A five-year marriage ends. One partner, within weeks, is suddenly visible with someone new, kissing in public, smiling for cameras. The cultural script wants a story about character. The body in that photograph is telling a different story entirely.
That is the story I want to tell. Because if you are reading this from inside your own separation, or watching someone you love go through one, the Page Six photo is a doorway into something that actually matters for your life.
From the Moment to the Thread
A five-year bond is not a contract. It is a co-regulating physiology. Two bodies learned to settle inside each other. Then, abruptly, they did not. The legal filing is the easy part. The body does not read the decree.
What you are looking at in those PDA photos is almost never what the comments section thinks it is. It is rarely vindictiveness, rarely "moving on too fast," rarely a moral indictment. It is a mammal that has been through a fire, looking for a place to put its hands down.
The Body Does Not Know You Are Divorced
Here is the part nobody warns you about when a long bond ends. Your limbic system, the ancient piece of brain that runs the bond, is still operating from the blueprint of the marriage. It is still scanning for the spouse's face. Still bracing for the old fights. Still running protective software built over years of being in one specific relationship with one specific person.
We are interdependent by design. We are born needing a primary person, and we need one all the way through. When the person who held that role in your physiology is suddenly no longer there, your body does not register an administrative change. It registers a survival emergency.
So what does a survival emergency do? It looks for relief. Fast.
The sudden rush of a new, highly affectionate romance is not a calculated media stunt. It is a desperate limbic intervention. The survival brain is demanding immediate, undeniable physical proof that the person is still desirable, still acceptable, still safe in the world. Public PDA is not the goal. The goal is to silence an internal alarm that will not turn off.
I have written more about this exact biology in my piece on Jessica Alba, Danny Ramirez, and the attachment science of post-divorce PDA, because the dynamic shows up in almost every separation I work with, celebrity or not.
The Shame Underneath the Photograph
Here is where it gets clinically interesting. Underneath the visible PDA is something almost no one talks about: shame.
When a five-year marriage collapses, the partner who feels they failed is drowning in an internal cocktail of "I am bad." Not in some abstract way. In a felt, somatic, can't-sit-still way. Shame whispers: I am too much. I am not enough. I did this. I broke this. I am the reason this ended.
Shame does not stay still. It moves. It looks for an exit. Avoidance says, if I can just stay busy enough, maybe I will not feel how much this hurts. Attack-other says, this was their fault. Attack-self collapses into "I am garbage." Withdrawal disappears into the cave.
A new partner, especially one willing to be photographed kissing you a few weeks after a divorce filing, is an almost perfect antidote to the shame cocktail. Externally administered. Immediately effective. A fresh slate where you have not failed yet. The new person says, with their body, "you are still wantable." And the survival brain exhales for the first time in months.
This is not pathology. This is the bond doing what the bond was built to do. The men I see in this exact pattern in my office are not villains. They are hurt. The protector parts running the show are loyal. They kept the person alive through the collapse. The problem is that protecting is not the same as connecting, and a new romance that arrives this fast is almost always protection wearing the costume of connection.
Fiat Love: Printing Affection You Cannot Back
There is a frame I use for what happens here that I want to give you, because once you see it, you cannot unsee it.
We are living through an era of Fiat Relationships. Just as central banks print money to paper over economic cracks, we use cheap performances of affection to paper over relational instability. We prioritize performance, the Instagram couple, the public kiss, the soft-launch reel, over substance, which is actual repair and finding ground together between two bodies. We want the feeling of connection without the cost of vulnerability.
Public PDA weeks after a five-year marriage ends is that printed affection in its purest form. It is issued without backing. There has been no time for grief. No time to metabolize the bond that just collapsed. No real labor done on the wound that drove the marriage onto the rocks. And yet here is the public ledger entry, proving the new connection is real and good and chosen.
The problem with printing affection you cannot back is the same problem with printing money you cannot back. It works for a minute. Then comes the inflation. The next gesture has to be bigger. The next photo more public. The next reassurance more total. Because the underlying alarm was never actually addressed. It was just papered over with a louder signal.
I am not saying this is what Jordan is doing. I am saying this is what the pattern looks like when I see it in my office, again and again, with people who are not famous and whose photos are not on Page Six.
Read the full piece, and join the waitlist for my book, at empathi.com.
The Two Questions Every Body Is Asking
Every behavior in a relationship, including how we exit one, is driven by two questions the body never stops asking.
Are you there for me? That is the pursuer's question.
Am I enough for you? That is the withdrawer's question.
When a marriage ends, both questions get a brutal answer. Sometimes it is "no." Sometimes it is "I do not know anymore." Either way, the body is left holding the silence.
Public PDA with a new person is a frantic, synthetic way of getting an immediate, photographable "yes" to "am I enough?" It bypasses the messy, slow, painful work of sitting with the actual answer the marriage gave you. It outsources the settling that no person can give themselves all at once after a long bond ends.
And the cruelty of this is that the answer is real, for a moment. The new person genuinely does find you attractive. They genuinely do want to kiss you. The body files that as evidence and the alarm quiets. The trouble is that the alarm will be back. Because the alarm was never about whether someone, somewhere, finds you wantable. The alarm was about a bond that just ended, and bonds end inside the body on their own timeline, not the dating timeline.
The Person Not in the Photograph
I have to name this, because my work is systemic. There is a person not in those photographs whose physiology is also being shaped by them. The estranged spouse.
Most of the hurt in a relationship comes from impact without intention. The new partner's intention may be nothing more than soothing his own pain and feeling desired. The impact, on the partner reading those photos from the other side of the divorce filing, is something close to absolute devastation. Her body, also still wired to him after five years, just got handed a public, visual answer to her own "am I enough" question, and the answer was "no, and look how publicly no."
This is not a judgment of Jordan. It is just biology being honest about what photographs do. The audience is not just the audience. The audience includes the person on the other side of the courtroom, whose body is keeping its own ledger of every image.
I wrote about a similar dynamic in Maren Morris's post-divorce comments and the body after divorce, because the impact-without-intention loop is one of the most predictable and most heartbreaking patterns I see in the months after a long bond ends.
Orphan Sovereignty vs. the Slower Kind
This is where I want to draw the line that actually matters.
There is a kind of sovereignty that gets celebrated in the algorithm and is really just avoidance wearing spiritual clothing. I call it orphan sovereignty. It sounds like: I am sovereign, you are sovereign, if we cannot get along, that is just how it is. It looks like a quick pivot to a new partner with a fresh story. It performs adulthood while actually skipping it.
The slower kind of sovereignty is harder to photograph. It looks like sitting with the alarm without medicating it. It looks like grieving the bond without immediately replacing it. It looks like letting the shame cocktail be felt in the body, all the way through, without bolting for an external antidote. It looks like asking, honestly, what dance was I running in that marriage? What protector part did I send into the room every night instead of myself? What did my partner never get from me that they needed?
That work does not photograph well. It happens in kitchens at 3 a.m., in therapists' offices, on long drives, on bathroom floors. It does not soft-launch. It does not get a Page Six photo.
But it is the only kind of sovereignty that actually changes what you bring to the next bond. Without it, the next relationship will run the exact same choreography as the last one, just with a different face on the other side of the bed. Your body uses the relational wounds of the past as the default blueprint for future love. You do not get a clean reset because your legal status changed. You get a reset by doing the real labor on what just ended.
What This Looks Like Inside the Reader's Life
Maybe you are not Jordan. Maybe you are the person who just left a long bond and is feeling the pull, hard, toward someone new who makes the alarm quieter for an hour. Maybe you are the person watching an ex move on in public and feeling something inside your chest you cannot name. Maybe you are the friend of either, wondering whether to say anything.
Whichever role you are in, I want to give you one thing. Slow down enough to ask what the body is actually asking for. If the answer is "make this feeling stop," that is not the same as "I have found my next person." Both can be true at once. They almost never are this fast.
The work after a long bond ends is to let the bond actually end inside you. Not just on paper. Inside the cells. That takes longer than the divorce filing. It often takes longer than the first new relationship. It is not glamorous. It does not generate engagement. And it is the only thing that breaks the pattern.
If you are watching someone perform their healing in public, hold them gently in your mind. They are not a villain. They are probably terrified. The photo is the protector. The person underneath the protector is somewhere quieter, and they may not be able to find their way there for a while.
Read the full piece, and join the waitlist for my book, at empathi.com.
The photograph is not the story. The body underneath the photograph is the story. Your job, whether you are inside the picture or watching from outside it, is to stop arguing with the image and start listening to the alarm. The alarm is the truth. The PDA is the protector. Tell me which one you are going to answer.
Top comments (0)