Katie Price, Lee Andrews, and the Biology of a Reunion That Doesn't Come: What Actually Happens Inside You When the Person You Reached For Isn't There
She booked the flight. She packed the bag. She got on the plane to Dubai expecting a reunion. And then, according to a recent Daily Mail piece, Katie Price's husband Lee Andrews was not released from prison as expected. She posted about "heartbreak and loss she didn't see coming." That last phrase is the whole story.
I am not going to diagnose Katie Price. I have never sat with her. I have no idea what her history looks like, what her marriage feels like from the inside, or what she is actually carrying. The Goldwater rule holds even when the tabloids are loud. What I want to talk about is the moment underneath her post. The moment your body was moving toward someone, and the door didn't open. Because that moment is not a celebrity moment. It happens in my office every week, in much less photographed form. And the shape of it is worth naming, because most of the advice culture will hurl at anyone in this position makes the injury worse, not better.
If you have ever driven to an airport to pick someone up who didn't come, or waited for a text that didn't arrive, or geared your whole body toward a homecoming that got cancelled at the last second, your nervous system already knows what I'm about to describe.
The Bridge From Her Story to Yours
You do not need to be married to someone in prison for this to be your story. The prison in your life might be an addiction. A demanding job in another city. A parent who is chronically unavailable. A partner who keeps promising to "be more present" and then isn't. Anything that repeatedly puts a wall between you and the person your body has decided is home.
Katie's story is dramatic. The mechanism is universal. And the mechanism is what we can actually work with.
Read the full piece, and join the waitlist for my book, at empathi.com.
Shame Is Not a Feeling. It Is the Sudden Interruption of Positive Affect.
Here is what most people get wrong about heartbreak. They think it's sadness. It isn't, not primarily. The first wave, the one that hits before language arrives, is shame. And shame is not embarrassment. It is a biological event.
Shame is what happens when you are reaching, softening, hoping, trusting, opening, and something breaks the movement. A tone. A pause. A text that doesn't come. A door at a Dubai hotel that doesn't open. A headline you didn't expect. In that split second, before the mind can form a sentence about what just happened, the body registers a tear in the attachment field. Your system loses altitude faster than your thinking can catch it.
Every shame moment carries a meaning about the bond underneath it. "I am too much." "I am not enough." "I am being left." "I am losing my place." The wound is not the interruption itself. The wound is what the body decides the interruption means about you.
This is why a cancelled reunion is not a "disappointment" in the way we casually use that word. Disappointment is what you feel when a restaurant is closed. What Katie Price described in her post is what happens when a body that had oriented itself, entirely, toward another body, finds the other body gone. The heart rate rises. The chest tightens. The mind starts running scenarios. And underneath all of it, there is a small voice asking a question the body has been asking since infancy.
The Two Questions Under Every Argument, Every Reach, Every Post
After sixteen years of sitting with couples, I can tell you that underneath every single fight I have ever witnessed there are really only two questions being asked. One partner is asking, in a hundred different ways, some version of "are you actually there for me." The other is asking, just as desperately, some version of "am I actually enough for you."
Everything else, the dishes, the schedule, the tone of voice, the missed flight, the news cycle, all of that is what I call drag and drop content. The nervous system does not care about drag and drop content. It cares about those two questions.
When a partner is physically removed from you by a prison, an addiction, a job, an illness, the universe hands you a devastating, non-negotiable answer to the first question. No. I am not there for you. Not because I don't love you. Because I cannot be. Your rational mind understands. Your limbic system, which does not read court documents, does not.
I've written more about this pattern in the context of the anxious avoidant relationship, where one partner learns to reach and the other learns to compress. When the reaching partner meets an unavailable partner, whether the unavailability is temperamental or literal, the body responds the same way. It protests. It panics. It looks for the person. And when the person cannot be found, the body does not know what to do with itself.
Your Limbic System Is a Little Naked Mole Rat
I say this to couples all the time. Your limbic system, the ancient part of your brain in charge of the bond, is like a little naked mole rat. It cannot see well. It cannot read. It cannot process news. It is just feeling around in the dark for one thing. Is my person there. And when it finds the person, the whole body settles. When it doesn't, the whole body panics.
From the moment you're born, if your primary person is not there for you, your body is wired to sound an alarm. Some ancient part of the brain treats the absence of that primary figure as an emergency, because for most of human history, it was. Being alone meant being eaten. Being alone meant dying. Your entire body is set up to protest the unavailability of the person you have oriented toward. This is not neediness. It is hardwired into who we are.
So when someone you love is behind a wall, physical or otherwise, and your body reached for them and they were not there, your physiology does not have a proportional response available. There is only the full-body protest of the naked mole rat, screaming into the dark.
This is why people do things in these moments that look, from the outside, hard to understand. Fly across the world with no confirmation. Post messages at three in the morning. Call the phone that will not be answered. Refuse to eat. Refuse to sleep. The body is not being dramatic. It is doing exactly what bodies were built to do when the person is gone. It is looking for somewhere it can put its feet down without falling through.
The Uncompleted Repair Is the Cruelest Cut
There is something worse than a rupture. It is a rupture that cannot be repaired.
Love, real love, is not the absence of hurt. Love is the presence of repair. It is the willingness to return. It is the emotional choreography that turns fights back into contact. Couples who last are not the ones who never rupture. They are the ones who know how to come back.
When the person you love is behind a wall you cannot cross, the return is blocked. You are stranded in what I sometimes call an impossible moment. You have been left. You have lost the connection. And there is no way, right now, in this hour, to get it back. It is not a fight you can finish. It is not a conversation you can have. You are alone with the missing piece, and the missing piece cannot pick up the phone.
This is what makes Katie's post so recognizable to anyone who has been in a version of this. "Heartbreak and loss I didn't see coming." The heartbreak is not the news of the delay. The heartbreak is standing on one side of a wall with your body oriented toward a person who cannot come through it, and having nowhere to put the reach.
Read the full piece, and join the waitlist for my book, at empathi.com.
The Third Party in the Room
I work often with couples where an addiction, an affair, an obsession, or an illness sits between them like a third entity in the room. In this situation, the third party has ultimate priority over the bond, and both partners know it. The addicted partner may love their partner. And in certain moments, they will choose the substance. That is just true. And the partner left behind cannot calm down, because their body knows the truth. Something else has the say.
When the third party is a prison, the dynamic is the same. The partner on the outside is not dealing with their partner alone. They are dealing with a system that has ultimate control over their partner's availability. No amount of love from either side can override the system. That is a specific, particular kind of powerlessness, and it takes a specific, particular toll on the body.
The reaching partner in this dynamic is often carrying a version of what I call, in my clinical shorthand, a fear of abandonment living inside the body. Not neediness. Fear. The reach is not aggression. It is not manipulation. It is a body saying please do not leave me. Please see me. Please let me matter. When the answer keeps coming back no, because the system will not let the answer come back yes, something inside starts to fray.
If you want to look at how these old patterns get formed, and whether they can shift, I've written about that here: can you change your attachment style. The short version is yes, but not through willpower and not through reading. Through felt, embodied experience of a person staying.
Scuba Diving, Not Judging
Here is what the tabloids and the comment sections do. They stay above the waterline. They look at the behavior. They score it. They decide who is naive and who is manipulative and who is stupid to have stayed and who deserves what.
That is not what a therapist does. What we do is scuba dive. We go under the surface of the reactivity to look at what is actually going on. What is the vulnerable feeling underneath. What is the real need underneath. What is the little naked mole rat actually asking for.
If you want to name your own pattern before you talk to anyone about it, you can take the free Figs Quiz.
Under Katie's post, if I were sitting with her, I would not be interested in her judgment or anyone else's judgment. I would be interested in what her body is doing. Where she feels the loss. What the loss is saying to her about herself. What older loss this loss is knocking on the door of. Because it is almost always an older loss. The current loss is the doorway. The home is the one from before.
The C-Curve, and Why Naming It Publicly Is a Real Thing
There is a movement I teach couples that I call making a C. At the top of the C, you are reactive. You are in the story of the other person. Your protector parts are in charge. You are angry, or defensive, or shut down, or performing. As you curve down, you start to notice. "I am affected. This is hitting me. My body is doing something." At the bottom of the C, something softer arrives. The primary emotion. The longing. The fear. The shame melting into grief.
When someone posts publicly about "heartbreak and loss I didn't see coming," and they do it without spin, without a villain, without a case being made, that is bottom-of-the-C language. That is a person reporting from underneath the reactivity, not on top of it. Whether that lasts, whether it holds, whether it survives contact with the next news cycle, is a different question. But the sentence itself is honest.
Reflexive participation is when you turn back toward the truth of your own experience. It sounds like: I am affected. This is how I am affected. This is what my body is doing. This is the fear underneath. This is the shame underneath. It is one of the hardest movements a human being can make. It is also, in my experience, the only movement that eventually lets the body settle.
What This Means For You, Not For Her
Here is where I want to bring this back to your life. Because you probably did not click on this article because you have deep feelings about Katie Price. You clicked because something in the story hooked something in you.
Maybe you are reaching for someone who cannot reach back. Maybe you are waiting for someone whose sobriety, or whose work, or whose distance, keeps them behind a wall. Maybe you had your own version of a cancelled reunion this year, and no one wrote a tabloid piece about it, but your body has been carrying it. Maybe you are the one behind the wall, and you know someone on the other side is losing their footing waiting for you.
The work, in any of these cases, is the same. Stop trying to solve the wall. Start attending to what your body is doing on your side of it. Notice the reach. Notice where the reach lands when it lands on nothing. Notice what the nothing says to you about yourself. That last piece is where the older wound lives, and the older wound is the one that actually needs care.
If your partner is willing to do any version of this with you, and you don't know how to bring them into it, I've written about that too: how do I get my partner to couples counseling. If they aren't willing, or aren't reachable right now, the work still starts with you. It has to. You are the one whose feet have to find the floor.
What to Do Next
Do not close the tab and go back to scrolling. If something in this reached you, put your hand on your chest for thirty seconds. Ask your body what it is actually reaching for. Not the person. The feeling underneath the person. Safety. Being seen. Mattering. Enoughness. Being chosen. Whatever comes up, that is the real thing.
Then find someone you can say it to. That is the whole game.
Read the full piece, and join the waitlist for my book, at empathi.com.
The wall between you and the person you love may not come down on your timeline. It may not come down at all. But the little naked mole rat inside you still needs a floor. Build the floor. That is what is yours to do.
Top comments (0)