The James Handy Tragedy: What Happens When a Young Man's Protector Parts Have No Container, and Why Some Family Systems Cannot Be Therapized
The news landed hard this week. James Handy, the veteran character actor with credits in Top Gun: Maverick and Jumanji, was allegedly stabbed to death in his Tarzana home. The person police arrested was his girlfriend's son. According to reporting from E! News, the alleged attacker was the adult son of the woman Handy had been in a relationship with. A blended household. A mother. Her son. Her partner. And a knife.
I am not going to speculate about Handy. I did not know him. I will not diagnose the young man who has been arrested. What I want to do is take this moment, while the headline is fresh and the comment sections are filling up with cheap verdicts, and walk you into the territory underneath it. The territory where a therapist actually works.
Because this story, stripped of celebrity, is a story I have seen many times. A new partner steps into the orbit of a mother and her grown or near-grown son. The son already carries something. The mother already carries something. The new man arrives carrying his own history. And the household becomes a pressure cooker for everything none of them ever metabolized.
I want to talk about that pressure cooker. I want to talk about what it asks of a young man's body. And I want to be very clear about the hard line where systemic empathy ends and physical violence begins.
The Bridge: From a Headline to the Body That Did It
This is the part where most coverage stops and most therapy blogs would never start. There is a tendency, in the wellness corner of the internet, to talk about trauma in soft, redemptive tones. To make everything healable. To make every protector part lovable.
I love the work. I believe in the work. But I am also going to tell you the truth: there are systems where the work does not apply. There are moments where biology has so completely overwhelmed governance that no therapist should be in the room trying to facilitate a conversation. That is the first thing this article has to say plainly, because if I do not say it, nothing else I say will mean anything.
The Absolute Line: Where Systemic Work Stops
Let me start with the rule, because the rule is non-negotiable.
When physical violence is in a family system, systemic family or couples therapy is contraindicated. Full stop. We do not sit a man who has stabbed someone, or who is threatening to, across from his family and ask everyone to explore the cycle. We do not facilitate dialogue between a mother, her son, and her boyfriend if anyone in that triangle is blocking exits, raising hands, or using their voice as a weapon to a point that another person in the room is in survival mode.
There is a phrase I keep coming back to in my own work, and it lives at the heart of this article: ninety percent of the time, a person's sense of being victimized by a family member is not a clean read. It is their side of the cycle. It is their activation telling them a story. But ten percent of the time, when someone is being punched, when someone has been blocked from leaving a room, when someone has been threatened with a weapon, their perception is one hundred percent trustworthy and objective.
We do not run systemic empathy through that ten percent. We run police, lawyers, and physical safety through it.
If the headline this week is accurate, this household crossed every line. There is no version of this where a clinician shows up in the aftermath with a "both sides" framing. The job of the therapist in the room with the survivors now is grief work, trauma work, and the slow rebuilding of bodies that just experienced the unthinkable.
The Sibling Society: Why Young Men Are Showing Up Like This
So if not "both sides," then what? What does the work have to say about a young adult son who, allegedly, picked up a knife?
I want to borrow a frame from the poet Robert Bly, because it has stayed with me for years. Bly called modern American culture a sibling society. He meant that we have stopped initiating young men into adulthood. We have removed the elders. We have removed the rites. We have removed the firm, containing, loving structures that used to take a boy and walk him, over years, into being a man who can hold his own rage without being hijacked by it.
What we are left with is a society of half-adults trying to parent each other. Mothers raising sons without elders. Stepfathers stepping in without any cultural script for what their role even is. Sons drifting into their twenties having never met an authority figure they trusted enough to bend the knee to.
This is not an excuse for anything. It is a context. Young men who explode in lethal ways are almost always young men whose protector parts grew up in a vacuum. There was no Elder there to say, this rage of yours is real, and I will teach you what to do with it. There was no Father, biological or otherwise, who held the firm container that allowed the boy to feel his fear without weaponizing it. There was often a mother trying to do the job of two people while running on empty.
I have written elsewhere about what happens when a father is not involved with a child, and how the absence becomes a phantom limb. The child's body builds an entire filing system around the missing person. That filing system does not stay in childhood. It walks into every room the grown child enters for the rest of their life, asking the same brutal question: am I worth showing up for? If the answer was no for long enough, by the time a new man arrives in the house and starts sleeping in the mother's bed, the answer has hardened into something dangerous.
What a Protector Part Looks Like When It Hijacks the Organism
In the work I do, we talk about protector parts. These are the strategies a young body develops to survive an environment that felt unsafe, shaming, or out of control. The Rager. The Bull. The Vanisher. The Performer. None of them are pathology. They are intelligent adaptations to real conditions.
But here is what nobody tells you about protector parts. They are loyal. They were hired by a frightened five-year-old or ten-year-old, and they will work that job for fifty years if no one fires them. They do not know the war is over. They do not know that the threat they were guarding against in 1998 is no longer in the room.
So when a new man walks into the kitchen, the protector part does not see a sixty-something character actor making coffee. It sees the original threat. It sees every man who ever came into the mother's orbit and rearranged the floor. It sees the moment the boy's body decided the world was not safe. And if that protector part has never been seated, never been governed, never been integrated into something larger, it can take the whole organism in a direction the conscious mind would never authorize.
In session, when I meet a protector part this loud, I do not try to fight it. I try to thank it. I try to find out who it was protecting and from what. I go straight to the family of origin and look for the little boy of ten or twelve who was beaten, shamed, abandoned, or terrified. I ask the rager who he was guarding.
That clinical work, done early enough, can disarm the part. Done too late, with the part already in motion, it cannot. The protector has already taken the wheel. The rational brain runs behind the survival brain, and in those few seconds, irreversible things happen.
Read the full piece, and join the waitlist for my book, at empathi.com.
The Not-Good-Enough System: Why It Is Almost Never Just One Person
I want to be careful with the next thing I say, because it can be misread.
People do not heal from the inside out alone. People are shaped by the systems that raised them. When I work with families, I am always looking for what I call the not-good-enough system. Not the not-good-enough mother. Not the not-good-enough father. The system. The whole field a child grew up inside, including the financial pressure, the cultural pressure, the intergenerational ledger of grief that was never named.
A not-good-enough system is any environment that fails to provide stable, predictable, emotionally attuned safety. A child born into one will adapt brilliantly. The adaptation will look like hypervigilance, or collapse, or charm, or rage. It will keep them alive. And it will follow them.
When a violent act explodes out of a young adult, the system was almost always sending signals for years. There was probably a mother running on fumes. There was probably a father who was either absent or terrifying or both. There was probably an addiction or an undiagnosed mental health condition. There was probably a moment, or many moments, where someone should have intervened and no one did, because the elders are gone and the village is gone and we have decided in this culture that families should solve everything privately behind their own doors.
I am not saying this to spread blame. I am saying it because the alternative, the story that one bad person did one bad thing in a vacuum, is the version of reality that lets the next tragedy happen.
The New Partner in a Wounded System
There is a piece of this story that I want to name directly, because it shows up in my office constantly. A mother and her grown son, especially after a divorce, separation, or death, often form a bond that is closer to a marriage than to a parent-child relationship. The son becomes the man of the house. The mother leans on him. He leans on her. It is intimate, it is enmeshed, and it is rarely named for what it is.
Then a new partner arrives. And the new partner has no idea he is walking into a marriage. He thinks he is dating a woman. He is actually walking into a triangle, and the third point of that triangle is a grown son whose body reads him as a threat to the only attachment figure that boy has ever trusted.
I have written about this dynamic from a different angle in what happens when an ex's new girlfriend interferes with custody. The new person is rarely the actual problem. They are the lightning rod. They are the body the unfinished business of the original family system attaches itself to.
In a healthy version of this scenario, the mother does the work of separating from her son's physiology before she invites a new partner into her bed. She grieves the marriage-shaped thing that grew up between them in the absence of a real partner. She helps her son grieve it too. The new man is welcomed as a new man, not slotted in as a replacement for the boy's psychological role.
In the unhealthy version, none of that happens. The mother brings the new man home and the son's protector parts go to DEFCON 1. The new man, having no idea what container he just stepped into, tries to assert normal partner behavior. And the household begins to vibrate at a frequency that, if no one intervenes, can end in exactly the kind of headline we are reading this week.
What This Means for the Reader
If you are reading this article because the headline disturbed you, sit with that disturbance. It is information.
If you are a mother in a blended household where there is tension between your grown or growing son and your partner, please do not tell yourself it will work itself out. The bodies in your home are telling you something. Get a clinician involved. Get the son into his own work, separate from the family. Do not bring everyone into the same room to talk it through if there has ever been a physical threat. That is the moment to call someone whose job is safety, not insight.
If you are the new partner stepping into a family system like this, slow down. The pace at which you integrate matters more than almost anything else. The son needs time. The mother needs time. You need time to read what is actually in the room before you start trying to be in it.
If you are the young man reading this, the one whose protector parts are loud and whose survival response has been on high alert for as long as you can remember, please find someone. A therapist. A men's group. An elder. Someone who can sit with the rage and not be afraid of it. Your protector parts saved you. They are not the enemy. But they are not built to govern a whole life, and if you do not seat them, they will eventually move in a direction you cannot take back.
I have written more about how grief and rupture cascade through a family system in the piece on what sudden loss does to bonds, and the principle is the same here. The body keeps the ledger. The body waits. If we do not metabolize what the body is holding, the body will eventually act on it.
What To Do Next
The James Handy story is going to fade from the news cycle this week. The family it happened inside will be carrying it forever. The young man arrested will be processed through a legal system that is not designed to understand what brought him to that night, and the surviving family members will be left in a grief that has no clean shape.
We can use stories like this for sport, or we can use them as a mirror. If something in your own household made your stomach tighten while you were reading, that is the signal. Not to panic. To act.
Read the full piece, and join the waitlist for my book, at empathi.com.
The protectors in your house are not the enemy. But they are not built to govern alone. Seat them, or they will seat you.
Top comments (0)