DEV Community

Frank Oge
Frank Oge

Posted on

Stop Fighting Over Price: A Developer’s Honest Look at Solana vs. Ethereum in 2025


If you ask a crypto trader which blockchain is better, they will show you a price chart.

If you ask a developer, they should show you the documentation.

​As a software engineer, I don’t care about the "flippening." I care about uptime, developer experience (DX), and user acquisition costs. I’ve built on both Ethereum (and its Layer 2s) and Solana.

​In 2025, the landscape has settled. It’s no longer a war; it’s a divergence. They are trying to solve different problems. Here is my honest breakdown of where you should build.

​1. The Language Barrier: Solidity vs. Rust

​This is the biggest filter for new devs.

​Ethereum (Solidity):

Solidity is purpose-built for smart contracts. If you know JavaScript or C++, it looks familiar. You can write a "Hello World" contract in 10 minutes.

​The Good: The tooling (Hardhat, Foundry) is mature. If you get stuck, there are 10,000 StackOverflow answers from 2018 to help you.

​The Bad: It is very easy to write bad code in Solidity. Footguns are everywhere. Reentrancy attacks are still a nightmare if you aren't careful.

​Solana (Rust):

Solana uses Rust (and Anchor framework). As I’ve written before, Rust is a beast.

​The Good: Safety. The compiler yells at you until your code is safe. Once it runs, it’s rock solid.

​The Bad: The learning curve is a wall. You aren't just learning a blockchain; you are learning memory management.

​Winner for Beginners: Ethereum.

Winner for Long-term Stability: Solana (Rust).

​2. The Architecture: Monolithic vs. Parallel

​This is where the "speed" difference comes from.

​Ethereum is like a single-lane highway where every car has to wait for the one in front. Even with Layer 2s (like Base or Arbitrum) taking the load off, the settlement layer is linear.

​Solana is a 12-lane highway. It uses "Sealevel" to process transactions in parallel. If I am minting an NFT and you are trading a token, we don't block each other.

​Real-world implication:

If you are building a global payments app or a high-frequency order book (like a DEX), you need Solana’s architecture. Ethereum simply cannot handle that throughput without complex rollups.

​3. The Ecosystem & "Vibe"

​Ethereum is Wall Street.

It’s where the institutions are. It’s where the high-value assets live. If you are building a protocol for banks, real estate tokenization, or high-value DeFi, you build on Ethereum. The users there are used to paying fees; they value security above all else.

​Solana is the Internet.

It’s consumer-facing. It’s for micropayments, gaming, DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure), and "normies." The users here expect transactions to be instant and free. If your app costs $5 to use, they are leaving.

​The Verdict: Where should you build?

​Stop looking for a "Ethereum Killer." It’s over. They both won.

​Build on Ethereum (or L2s) if you are building complex financial instruments, need maximum decentralization, or are targeting institutional money.

​Build on Solana if you are building a consumer app, a game, or anything that requires thousands of transactions per second.

​I’m currently experimenting with both. The best engineers in 2026 aren't maximalists, they are polyglots.

Frank Kelechi Oge

Top comments (0)