Alexander Yesenin-Volpin, a distinguished logician and mathematician, revolutionized the Soviet dissident movement by introducing the concept of civil obedience. Instead of open revolution, he proposed a struggle based on ruthless semantic consistency and a literal reading of applicable laws. His approach, known as legalism, forced the authorities to confront their own legal declarations, leading to the system's self-negation. This article explores the history of the Openness Meeting and the role of samizdat as a decentralized information infrastructure. It also analyzes how Wolpin's historical methods correspond to contemporary compliance systems and whistleblowing mechanisms. This is a fascinating study of the performative power of legal texts and the limits of authoritarian arbitrariness, demonstrating that precise manipulation of the system can be more damaging than ideological dispute.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
Top comments (0)