If you’re gonna specify 30° (1/3 of a right angle, i.e. 1/12 of a full angle), you don’t need 30deg nor 0.0833turn – nor do you need 33.333grad. You might want to use calc(1/12 * 1turn) – probably the easiest to read notation.
Full-time web dev; JS lover since 2002; CSS fanatic. #CSSIsAwesome
I try to stay up with new web platform features. Web feature you don't understand? Tell me! I'll write an article!
He/him
Definitely a solid option. I personally would have a hard time visualizing how much of a turn that is, since I'm super not used to thinking in twelfths, but if you like it, roll with it!
That's the big takeaway that I hope people get from this article: adding turns and grads into the mix gives us way more flexibility in finding the most personally useful way to express our angles. Use the one that makes the most sense to you and your team!
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
If you’re gonna specify 30° (1/3 of a right angle, i.e. 1/12 of a full angle), you don’t need
30deg
nor0.0833turn
– nor do you need33.333grad
. You might want to usecalc(1/12 * 1turn)
– probably the easiest to read notation.Definitely a solid option. I personally would have a hard time visualizing how much of a turn that is, since I'm super not used to thinking in twelfths, but if you like it, roll with it!
That's the big takeaway that I hope people get from this article: adding
turn
s andgrad
s into the mix gives us way more flexibility in finding the most personally useful way to express our angles. Use the one that makes the most sense to you and your team!