Nice work. You could also mention issues related to cluster size and fragmentation.
Unfortunately I am not inclined to agree to your conclusion. Generally it's better to use NTFS with exceptions to:
compability with other devices (but now many have already support to ntfs)
discovering how files system works internally
4GB file limitation is crippling to any modern OS. If I remember correctly, you cannot even install Windows now on FAT32. For linux you have also ext3/4 which is better than NTFS.
Well, exFAT is nice replacement for FAT32. Good for external or flash drives. Better compatibility than NTFS, worse than FAT32. Still, you should have in mind that it not good choice if you have many small files due to cluster size.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Nice work. You could also mention issues related to cluster size and fragmentation.
Unfortunately I am not inclined to agree to your conclusion. Generally it's better to use NTFS with exceptions to:
Not sure about exFAT?
Well, exFAT is nice replacement for FAT32. Good for external or flash drives. Better compatibility than NTFS, worse than FAT32. Still, you should have in mind that it not good choice if you have many small files due to cluster size.