For a long time, global influence in technology followed a predictable pattern.
Work at a major company.
Ship widely used products.
Gain visibilit...
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
The point about specialization resonates. I've noticed the devs who get the most traction aren't the ones posting about everything — they're the ones who become the go-to person for one specific thing. Like if you need to know about X, you read their stuff first.
That said, I'd push back a bit on the consistency point. Quality matters more than cadence imo. I've seen devs who post something genuinely insightful once a month get way more engagement than people churning out daily "10 tips" listicles. The algorithm might reward frequency, but real influence comes from being the person whose posts you actually click.
The open source angle is underrated too. Even small PRs to popular projects get your name in front of people who actually ship software. Way more valuable than social media followers who just scroll past.
That’s a great take. Specialisation definitely builds recognition and trust faster than trying to cover everything.
I also believe: quality over cadence wins long-term. Frequency may help reach, but real influence comes from being worth reading.
And yes, open source is highly underrated. Even small contributions build real credibility with people who actually ship, which matters far more than passive followers.
Nice article to read
Thank you for your words.
Good article!
Thank you, Anna.
Developers should focus on distribution, with development.
Nice Read!
Thank you.
I think that is an insightful post, and this is new world. Put your paddle in the water, because the tsunami is coming
Thank you, I appreciate that. It’s definitely a fast-moving shift, and the best approach is to engage early and adapt continuously.