My main job is not in IT, but I do have a CS degree and have been programming for over 20 years (only born in 1984). I hate dealing with Servers, and want Graph Databases to be the new norm.
I don’t think all Graph databases have that problem and can index differently. My issue with Arrangodb, like Tigergraph, is the price. Need to see examples to compare. Thanks for info.
Similar to how MongoDB worked, they make money on the enterprise extras that are probably necessary for large scale deployments. However, you can roll a cluster or a single server on some compute. They also have Oasis, which is like Atlas.
All that said, I do like Firestore's pay as you grow model and GCP has a great free tier for prototyping. Most databases, if you still want performance, requires a minimum buy-in regardless of use. Sometimes the difference of a few hundred a month can pause experimental projects. I really hope Google does some nice updates to Firestore.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
I don’t think all Graph databases have that problem and can index differently. My issue with Arrangodb, like Tigergraph, is the price. Need to see examples to compare. Thanks for info.
Well, it is open source with the Apache v2 license.
github.com/arangodb/arangodb
Similar to how MongoDB worked, they make money on the enterprise extras that are probably necessary for large scale deployments. However, you can roll a cluster or a single server on some compute. They also have Oasis, which is like Atlas.
All that said, I do like Firestore's pay as you grow model and GCP has a great free tier for prototyping. Most databases, if you still want performance, requires a minimum buy-in regardless of use. Sometimes the difference of a few hundred a month can pause experimental projects. I really hope Google does some nice updates to Firestore.