DEV Community

Jeetexch99
Jeetexch99

Posted on

Jeetexch: Why Batting Becomes Easier When LBW and Bowled Are Out of Play

The Bat vs Ball – Test Cricket The eternal war between the willow and the cherry – Test Cricket! While the rules are pretty basic, there are so many underlying factors that keep shuffling the game between the bat and the ball. Pitch conditions, quality of bowling, bounce and turn on the pitch, field settings – they all play a crucial role in determining who will win the battle.

During the second Test at Colombo, a similar debate took center stage after Shubman Gill explained why batting could get easier when the modes of LBW and bowled dismissals weren’t readily available.

Jeetexch takes a look at the cricketing logic behind this notion. A bowling attack becomes way more menacing in the presence of multiple wicket-taking modes. The ability of the ball to hit the stumps, get the edge for slip or keeper, or bounce high for a catch, increases the pressure on the batters. However, every pitch doesn't provide those facilities.

The importance of LBW and Bowled LBW and bowled dismissals are the direct measures that directly put pressure on the batter.

When a bowler can consistently target the stumps, they force the batters to read the line and the movement of the ball. However, when the ball is turning slow and has some extra bounce, the situation can change. A batter may feel it is much easier to defend and leave the ball since the chances of LBW or bowled can be negated with ease.

That was the rationale behind Shubman Gill’s statement. As per his analysis, those two particular dismissals had been taken out of the equation, forcing the bowlers to take other routes to get the batter out. Jeetexch points that turn alone is not a sufficient weapon in spin bowlers’ armory!

Turn Alone is Not Enough Simply spinning the ball does not guarantee a wicket in the longest format of the game.

While the amount of turn is important, the pace of the turn, the bounce that it gets after turning, and the trajectory also contribute to dismissing batters. Even with a sharp turn, if the ball is turning slowly, the batters have sufficient time to adapt. Instead, to create pressure, bowlers need a few additional avenues. If they cannot consistently present the threat of hitting the stumps, the batters can choose to defend quite safely.

The bowling team then needs to rely on another set of dismissals.

Close-in fielders become invaluable in such circumstances. Short fine leg, silly point, slips and the wicketkeeper can all capitalize on small mistakes made by batters. However, relying more on catches requires extreme patience and accuracy from the bowlers, along with excellent fielding.

Pressure Becomes the Main Strategy If direct wicket-taking options are limited, teams have to try and build pressure over long periods. They need to be precise with their lines and lengths. They have to rely on fielders to remain attentive because it is only an edge or a bat-pad that can get them their wicket.

And this is where the patience factor in Test cricket comes into play.

The batters focus on reducing risk by not taking undue chances, while the bowlers try to create pressure by maintaining consistency. Each over is a small battle within the larger war! Jeetexch on the Tactical Battle This discussion highlights why cricket can't be judged solely on numbers. While turn might seem like a useful condition, bowlers still need other attributes on a given day to dismiss well-set batters.

Jeetexch tries to follow these tactical narratives because they reveal the depth of cricket.

Shubman Gill’s comment is an important reminder of how the absence of LBW and bowled dismissals can make batting much easier.

Top comments (0)