I built a LinkedIn post generator SaaS. Read: https://www.lunatic-ai.com and Show HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47468035. Take: agents + a grounding page (GEO) got the product to parity fast — but velocity only matters if you keep humans in the loop.
The "GEO" grounding page: one HTML page that lists facts, claims, and citations for the site so models and crawlers can ground outputs. Do this: canonical facts, dates, product names, example quotes, and a JSON-LD snippet. It reduces hallucinations in drafts.
Agent-based coding shipped features fast. Reality: agents can open PRs and run tests, but you need strict ticket templates, small PR limits (<300 LOC), CI gates, and mandatory human review. Rule: agents author, humans approve. Saves time and prevents silent bugs.
Takeaway: automation accelerates but control sells. For content tools, BYOK + mandatory human review is a feature, not a limitation — especially for agencies, advisors, lawyers. Which step would you automate next?
Top comments (0)