DEV Community

Discussion on: Bitcoin Blockchain Bullshit?

Collapse
 
jmfayard profile image
Jean-Michel πŸ•΅πŸ»β€β™‚οΈ Fayard • Edited

Frankly I regret trying to read that blog.
Why those logorrhea of words and jargons in the BBB world?
Whatever is well conceived can be clearly said, and the words to say it flow with ease.

Collapse
 
rmcdaniel profile image
Richard McDaniel

I'm happy to explain any jargon that you find confusing.

Thread Thread
 
jmfayard profile image
Jean-Michel πŸ•΅πŸ»β€β™‚οΈ Fayard

Can you explain what you find interesting in this article without using jargon?

Thread Thread
 
rmcdaniel profile image
Richard McDaniel

Jargon is part of any specialized field. Do you get mad when aerospace engineers use jargon like "apogee" or "lagrange point"?

If you have a specific question, I'm happy to answer it. But I'm not going to rewrite an entire article just because you refuse to learn what some words mean.

Thread Thread
 
jmfayard profile image
Jean-Michel πŸ•΅πŸ»β€β™‚οΈ Fayard • Edited

Fine, you do what you want.

My point of view is that every programmer can write code that is understood by the compiler, but the best programmers write code that is easily understood by humans.

Same thing here: everyone can write about in a way that is obscure and hard to read. Jargon is fine if you are sure that everyone works in the field and understands it, but it would be a mistake to assume that this is the case here.

Once I had the curiosity to read the four ground breaking scientific papers from Albert Einstein's miracle year of 1905 and it's ground breking stuff, like 10.000 times more important that whatever that blogger is trying to say, but it's surprisingly readable.

The 1905 Papers - Annus Mirabilis of Albert Einstein - Research Guides at Library of Congress

So is my basic assumption that whenever something is harder to read than Albert Einstein's papers - and that happens surprisingly often - it's not because it's profound but because it's as best written for the wrong audience, badly written, or at worse deliberately misleading us.

Thread Thread
 
rmcdaniel profile image
Richard McDaniel

Did you have an actual question or not?

Thread Thread
 
jmfayard profile image
Jean-Michel πŸ•΅πŸ»β€β™‚οΈ Fayard

I don't, have a nice day.