Tech Lead/Team Lead. Senior WebDev.
Intermediate Grade on Computer Systems-
High Grade on Web Application Development-
MBA (+Marketing+HHRR).
Studied a bit of law, economics and design
Location
Spain
Education
Higher Level Education Certificate on Web Application Development
getLast / getTail has the same utility than getFirst / getHead, you can implement it or not, just depends on the need of getting some specific position, no matter the index being first, last, in the middle or in any other arbitrary position.
If for any reason you need to check the second element multiple times then sure, go and implement a getSecond. Or simply implement a search method and ask for the second one, which will be the same.
Is a non sense to argue about that since we are not talking about a specific use case. On the other hand, being a double linked list has nothing to do with the utility of those hypothetical methods. Again, they only have no sense when talking about circular lists, which is not the case.
Just to clarify, a circular doubly linked list is the same than a doubly linked list but the head and the tail are considered as prev/next between them (so you'll always have a "next" or a "prev" item as there's no end, thus there are no start point and you need to consider the number of items to avoid infinite looping.
You can learn more about here: humanwhocodes.com/blog/2019/03/com....
Best regards
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
getLast / getTail has the same utility than getFirst / getHead, you can implement it or not, just depends on the need of getting some specific position, no matter the index being first, last, in the middle or in any other arbitrary position.
If for any reason you need to check the second element multiple times then sure, go and implement a getSecond. Or simply implement a search method and ask for the second one, which will be the same.
Is a non sense to argue about that since we are not talking about a specific use case. On the other hand, being a double linked list has nothing to do with the utility of those hypothetical methods. Again, they only have no sense when talking about circular lists, which is not the case.
Just to clarify, a circular doubly linked list is the same than a doubly linked list but the head and the tail are considered as prev/next between them (so you'll always have a "next" or a "prev" item as there's no end, thus there are no start point and you need to consider the number of items to avoid infinite looping.
You can learn more about here: humanwhocodes.com/blog/2019/03/com....
Best regards