Too syntactically different?... developers are so blinded nowdays that they even could see a clean and easy language. Imba is extremelly easy and very human friendly, very similar to Ruby and Python. But ok, let continuous to be verbose. Lets write ugly React code.
I'm a young black developer and I'm in love with tech. I love to discuss about tech with all kind of people. I'm also trying to teach, to give back what the tech community gave to me !
Verbosity isn’t a BAD BAD thing if it helps readability and comprehension. I also think the comparison with Python isn’t valid. Python isn’t a DSL aim to handle content markup, style and business logic.
Ruby & Python are old languages and were not designed to be used in Frontend context. It just makes no sense. It would only be useful for backend people coming for some frontend gigs without the deep comprehension of what's really going on in Javascript.
What you call "human friendly" is YOUR opinion. If "human friendly" is just writing "sentences" with spaces as only separator, then I except your code to have the same flaws as humans sentences have: lack of explicit instructions and interpretation issues.
However Javascript & web standards exists without your opinion and millions of devs around the world are very ok with it.
Imba may just be sugar for lazy backends ... (Except memoized dom, this can be pretty good)
Creating new syntaxes may just split our strong community into pieces, and force developers to make a choice and loose job opportunities. Vue & React are close enough to be able to make a switch if needed, because they still rely on JS comprehension.
Imba doesn't...
Verbose is not wasting time, verbose is just explicit...
You loose a small time once while writing it, but you win time in readability/comprehension every time you go over that code again.
It's like tests...
Too syntactically different?... developers are so blinded nowdays that they even could see a clean and easy language. Imba is extremelly easy and very human friendly, very similar to Ruby and Python. But ok, let continuous to be verbose. Lets write ugly React code.
Verbosity isn’t a BAD BAD thing if it helps readability and comprehension. I also think the comparison with Python isn’t valid. Python isn’t a DSL aim to handle content markup, style and business logic.
Ruby & Python are old languages and were not designed to be used in Frontend context. It just makes no sense. It would only be useful for backend people coming for some frontend gigs without the deep comprehension of what's really going on in Javascript.
What you call "human friendly" is YOUR opinion. If "human friendly" is just writing "sentences" with spaces as only separator, then I except your code to have the same flaws as humans sentences have: lack of explicit instructions and interpretation issues.
However Javascript & web standards exists without your opinion and millions of devs around the world are very ok with it.
Imba may just be sugar for lazy backends ... (Except memoized dom, this can be pretty good)
Creating new syntaxes may just split our strong community into pieces, and force developers to make a choice and loose job opportunities. Vue & React are close enough to be able to make a switch if needed, because they still rely on JS comprehension.
Imba doesn't...
Verbose is not wasting time, verbose is just explicit...
You loose a small time once while writing it, but you win time in readability/comprehension every time you go over that code again.
It's like tests...
There are many languages in the world, and room for plenty more. Don't worry, IMBA won't "split" the JavaScript community -- JS is way too huge.