Introduction
You're launching a Pump.fun token and everyone says "you need more holders" and "you need more makers."
But what's the difference? Aren't they the same thing?
No. And confusing them will waste your SOL.
In this guide, I'll explain the exact difference between maker count and holder count, when each metric matters, and which bot you actually need for your situation.
What is Maker Count?
Maker count represents the number of unique wallet addresses that have traded your token.
A wallet becomes a "maker" when it executes a swap—either buying or selling. The same wallet trading 50 times still counts as 1 maker.
Key characteristics:
- Measures trading activity breadth
- Wallet can buy AND sell (still 1 maker)
- Doesn't require holding tokens
- Tracked on DexScreener "Makers" column
Example:
- Wallet A buys → sells → 1 maker
- Wallet B buys → holds → 1 maker
- Wallet C sells airdrop → 1 maker
- Total makers: 3
What is Holder Count?
Holder count represents the number of unique wallet addresses currently holding your token.
A wallet is a "holder" if it has a non-zero token balance right now. If it sells everything, it's no longer a holder.
Key characteristics:
- Measures ownership distribution
- Wallet must currently hold tokens
- Real-time snapshot (changes with every sell)
- Tracked on DexScreener "Holders" column, Pump.fun UI
Example:
- Wallet A holds 1,000 tokens → 1 holder
- Wallet B holds 100 tokens → 1 holder
- Wallet C sold everything → 0 holders
- Total holders: 2
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Aspect | Maker Count | Holder Count |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Unique wallets that traded | Unique wallets currently holding |
| Action required | Buy OR sell | Buy and keep |
| Permanence | Permanent (once a maker, always counted) | Temporary (lost when wallet sells) |
| What it signals | Trading interest, market activity | Community size, long-term interest |
| Primary platform | DexScreener trending | Pump.fun, trust signals |
| Bot type | Maker bot (buy + sell) | Holder bot (buy only) |
How Each Metric Affects Rankings
Maker Count → DexScreener Trending Score
DexScreener's algorithm weighs unique makers as a signal of organic trading activity. High maker count suggests:
- Many different people are interested
- Trading isn't concentrated in few wallets
- Market has genuine breadth
Impact: Direct influence on DexScreener trending position.
Holder Count → Trust & Credibility
Holder count signals community strength. High holder count suggests:
- People want to own the token long-term
- Distribution is healthy (not concentrated)
- Less likely to be a quick pump-and-dump
Impact: Influences trader psychology, Pump.fun visibility, and analyst ratings.
When Maker Count Matters More
Focus on makers when:
1. You Want DexScreener Trending
DexScreener explicitly weighs unique makers. If trending is your goal, makers are essential.
2. Your Volume-to-Maker Ratio is Off
High volume + low makers looks like wash trading. Adding makers legitimizes your volume.
3. Competing Against High-Maker Tokens
If top trending tokens have 1,000+ makers and you have 100, you won't outrank them regardless of volume.
4. You Want Activity Without Holding Pressure
Maker bots buy and sell, so tokens cycle back. No permanent buy pressure or holder dilution.
When Holder Count Matters More
Focus on holders when:
1. You're Building Community Trust
Traders check holder count before buying. 500+ holders signals "real community."
2. You're on Pump.fun King of the Hill
Pump.fun's leaderboard factors holder count. Low holders = lower ranking.
3. You Want Distribution Score
Analytics platforms flag concentrated holdings. More holders = better distribution.
4. You're Preparing for Graduation
Post-bonding-curve tokens need strong holder bases for sustained interest.
The Overlap: One Wallet Can Be Both
Here's what confuses people:
A wallet that buys and holds is counted as:
- 1 maker (it traded)
- 1 holder (it currently holds)
A wallet that buys then sells is counted as:
- 1 maker (it traded)
- 0 holders (it sold everything)
This is why holder bots and maker bots produce different results:
| Bot Type | Wallet Action | Maker Count | Holder Count |
|---|---|---|---|
| Holder Bot | Buy only | +1 | +1 |
| Maker Bot | Buy + Sell | +1 | 0 |
| Volume Bot | Repeat trades | +0 (same wallet) | +0 or +1 |
Which Bot Do You Need?
Scenario 1: "I need DexScreener trending"
Use: Maker Bot (primary) + Volume Bot (secondary)
DexScreener weights unique makers. Maker bot generates fresh wallets that trade. Volume bot adds trading volume to support the maker count.
Scenario 2: "I need Pump.fun credibility"
Use: Holder Bot (primary) + Bump Bot (secondary)
Traders on Pump.fun check holder count. Holder bot creates permanent holders. Bump bot keeps you visible on front page.
Scenario 3: "I want both trending + credibility"
Use: All bots strategically
- Start with Bump Bot (visibility)
- Add Holder Bot (credibility)
- Add Maker Bot (DexScreener ranking)
- Add Volume Bot (healthy charts)
Scenario 4: "I have limited budget"
Priority order:
- Bump Bot - Get visible first
- Holder Bot - Build credibility (most trust impact per SOL)
- Maker Bot - DexScreener ranking
- Volume Bot - If budget remains
Cost Comparison
| Bot Type | Cost Per Unit | What You Get |
|---|---|---|
| Maker Bot | ~0.005-0.013 SOL/maker | +1 unique maker (DexScreener) |
| Holder Bot | ~0.007 SOL/holder | +1 unique holder + +1 maker |
| Volume Bot | ~0.0005 SOL/txn | +Volume (no new makers/holders) |
| Bump Bot | ~0.0005 SOL/bump | +Activity, front page visibility |
Note: Holder bots give you BOTH a holder and a maker (since buying counts as trading). Maker bots only give makers (since they sell).
The Optimal Strategy: Stack Both Metrics
Top Pump.fun tokens don't choose between makers and holders—they grow both:
Phase 1: Launch (First 30 minutes)
- Bump Bot at 300-500 BPM → Front page visibility
- Holder Bot at 100-200 HPM → Build initial credibility
Phase 2: Growth (30 minutes - 2 hours)
- Continue Bump Bot (maintain visibility)
- Maker Bot at 200-500 MPM → DexScreener ranking
- Volume Bot → Support healthy charts
Phase 3: Maintenance (Ongoing)
- Reduce all bots to sustainable rates
- Focus on organic community growth
- Use bots to maintain competitive metrics
Common Mistakes
Mistake 1: Only Running Holder Bot
You get holders but low unique maker count. DexScreener ranking suffers.
Fix: Add maker bot for DexScreener trending.
Mistake 2: Only Running Maker Bot
You get makers but low holder count. Traders see "no community."
Fix: Add holder bot for credibility.
Mistake 3: Confusing Volume Bot for Maker Bot
Volume bot reuses same wallet. Maker count stays flat.
Fix: Use maker bot specifically for unique maker growth.
Mistake 4: Running Everything at Once Day 1
Budget drains fast, metrics spike unnaturally.
Fix: Phase your approach. Visibility → credibility → ranking → volume.
Key Takeaways
- Maker count = unique wallets that traded (includes buyers AND sellers)
- Holder count = unique wallets currently holding (only active balances)
- Maker bots do buy + sell (increases makers, not holders)
- Holder bots do buy only (increases BOTH makers and holders)
- DexScreener trending needs makers - Volume alone won't rank you
- Pump.fun credibility needs holders - Makers alone won't build trust
- Optimal strategy uses both - Stack metrics for maximum impact
Next Steps
Need to grow both metrics? Here's where to start:
Jumpbit Maker Bot - 500 makers/minute for DexScreener ranking
Jumpbit Holder Bot - 500 holders/minute for community credibility
Top comments (0)