Grammarly is really awesome, especially for a non-native speaker like me.
But I have to admit, after I worked with a few human editors for a while, Grammarly felt rather basic. Also, I had the realization that many things Grammarly highlights are just matter of taste and not bad writing.
Five editors would change five different things in my texts, haha.
I agree with you, but two things Grammarly helps you to do are avoiding common mistakes and making your vocabulary broader. I don’t see it as a tool that can replace a native English editor.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Grammarly is really awesome, especially for a non-native speaker like me.
But I have to admit, after I worked with a few human editors for a while, Grammarly felt rather basic. Also, I had the realization that many things Grammarly highlights are just matter of taste and not bad writing.
Five editors would change five different things in my texts, haha.
I agree with you, but two things Grammarly helps you to do are avoiding common mistakes and making your vocabulary broader. I don’t see it as a tool that can replace a native English editor.