DEV Community


Discussion on: Turn a Stream of Objects into an Object of Streams

kosich profile image
Kostia Palchyk Author • Edited

Totally agree with all three points!
And I love your examples β€” this gives some perspective! Thanks πŸ‘

I've started this only because it was a fun dev challenge, I was sure as an API it's useless and error-prone! Then when it was ready... I began to have doubts πŸ€”πŸ˜„

The shorter notation might make sense in templates like in <$> or Recks...

Probably it's a maker's affection of some sort: when you're painting something for a day long, and you look at it -- and it's crap, you know it's crap but still you kinda like it πŸ˜”

I think, I'll finish and post the state thing.
Maybe even include it into proxify lib (bad naming here too πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ)
Still not sure what to do w/ autorun β€” will polish it, then we'll see...

BTW, I've been sharing all this on twitter too, here's a thread
VΓ­ctor Oliva made another cool autorun concept β€” check it out!
(I'd ping you long ago, though haven't found you there)

and here's latest concept w/ state & autorun from twitter:

state and autorun concepts

Thanks for taking your time to look into this on Friday evening πŸ™‚
Have a good weekend!

SATURDAY: okay... I've shared autorun on github (no npm package, naming is still a problem)

autorun latest