There's a data problem in industrial organizations-it's just not necessarily a lack of data.
Machines give us measurements. RFID systems keep track of assets. Sensors observe equipment and surroundings. Enterprise systems save production, stock, maintenance, and logistics data.
The more difficult question is: How do you actually use all of that data to make better decisions?
This is where the combination of AI and the Internet of Things begins to come in more handy. IoT can enable visibility into the world around us, but AI can be used to analyze the data, recognize patterns, predict conditions, and make decisions.
However, there's a key difference between collecting data and building operational intelligence.
The Data Problem Comes Before the AI Problem
We can quickly dive into an industrial AI project simply by questioning which model we should use.
Too often, that shouldn't be the first question.
Before any AI system can make an effective evaluation, the organization must understand what the AI is seeing, the source of the data, and if it reliably describes the physical environment.
Consider a temperature sensor on industrial equipment.
The sensor is indicating an increase. Will that alone be enough to determine there is an issue?
Not necessarily.
Is this the proper machine for this sensor?
Is the machine under abnormal load?
Was the temperature slowly or abruptly?
Does the reading match previous trends?
Is anything else having the same issue?
The answers provide context.
If you don't have that context, then even a very intelligent AI model may not be able to figure out what a given measurement is referring to.
AIoT Connects Physical Data With Intelligence
The merging of these two technologies is also known as AIoT, or Artificial Intelligence of Things.
Classic IoT is about connecting things and deriving insights. It simply describes them. It's not smart. That's where AI comes in.
Instead of only asking:
"What is the sensor reporting?"
an AI-enabled system can begin asking:
"What does this information mean?"
"Is this behavior unusual?"
"What might happen next?"
"What response should be considered?"
That change can alter the application of data from industry.
A connected asset-tracking system can reveal the whereabouts of equipment. Analytics and AI have the potential to pinpoint odd usage patterns or discover utilization issues or bottlenecks.
A monitoring system can also give you the condition of your equipment, and AI can assist you in recognizing any trends that may be a warning of a developing problem.
A system of inventory can reveal the whereabouts of goods. Through analysis, however, one can observe inefficiencies or potential disruptions.
The value is not just in having more information, but in tying it to context and decisions.
A Practical Framework: Identify, Sense, Decide, Act
One useful way to understand this progression is:
Identify Sense Decide Act
Each stage addresses a different question.
1. Identify: What or who is involved?
The system determines the identity, location, movement, or relationship of a physical object, person, vehicle, material, or piece of equipment.
For the application this could be RFID, BLE, UWB, GPS/GNSS, or any other identification and location technology.
2. Sense: What is happening?
Sensors and connected systems gather the physical environment.
Readings could be temperature, vibration, pressure, movement, equipment condition, environment, or other data that is used to monitor an activity.
These are the inputs that help the system understand the physical world.
3. Decide: What does the information mean?
AI can also integrate these perceptions with historical data, enterprise information, and the operational context.
We are not striving to create a dashboard.
It is to aid in deciding if it is (or isn't) normal, abnormal, changing or potentially significant- and, if so, how we may respond.
4. Act: What should happen next?
Then, the decision can be linked to an operational action.
You could trigger a report to an operator, issue a work order or task, modify the workflow, give instruction or, if applicable, link a permitted decision to robots or machinery.
The degree of automation should be determined by the application, and the consequence of action.
Physical AI Changes the Question
And this is where Physical AI gets exciting.
AI may need not to end at software recommendations. AI-supported decisions might be able to interface with equipment, industrial controls, robotics, or physical workflows.
But behaving in the physical realm, that brings a whole other need.
A bad piece of advice in a computer program can be inconvenient. Sending an incorrect instruction to a piece of industrial equipment can be a lot more serious.
As a result, issues like the following have to be taken into account with industrial Physical AI:
- Authorization
- Operating limits
- Command validation
- Cybersecurity
- Human oversight
- Auditability
- Fail-safe behavior
- Monitoring and verification
Not every decision should be automated.
There are some instances where a person may need to review and approve a recommendation, or where a human can just approve an action. For highly regulated, lower risk activities, bounded automation might be one solution.
The correct strategy relies on the consequences of failure, the quality of the data and operational context.
Action Without Feedback Is Not Enough
The physical world should not be arrived at and then left.
Once an action takes place, the system must recognise it.
Did the equipment respond as expected?
Did the condition improve?
Did the workflow change?
Did the physical result match the expected outcome?
This creates a feedback loop:
Identify Sense Decide Act Verify
Verification about it is vital as soon as environments are steadily typically.
This information may be used to inform future decisions, procedures, policy, or to inform models. Additionally, it can help determine if an intervention has led to the desired result.
Start With the Operational Problem
The most promising industrial AI solutions should start with a well-defined operational challenge rather than a wish to use a certain solution.
Questions organizations can ask before selecting sensors, AI models or automation systems:
- What needs better visibility?
- What physical information is currently missing?
- Which decisions take too long?
- Where are anomalies difficult to detect?
- What action should follow a better decision?
- Which actions require human approval?
- How will the organization verify that an intervention worked?
These questions relate technology to an actual operation goal.
AI cannot save you when you don't know the problem to begin with. The same is true of the IoT: It can produce all the data you want and still not lead to a better decision.
The opportunity lies in connecting the two.
Reliable data in the physical world is what AI lives in. AI is what gives data meaning. Decisions are how intelligence interacts with the physical world. Feedback tells us whether those decisions were successful.
This is a more practical way to think about industrial AI than just asking: "How do I add a new AI model to my system?
In the end, perhaps the key to industrial intelligence isn't the volume of data organizations assemble but the degree to which they tie together physical reality, data, intelligence, decision making, action, and verification into a single operating cycle.
Top comments (0)