Yeah wow, quite a different angle from most "AI coding" articles I've come across on dev.to - this sounds like "the rise of the Citizen Developer", to use a slightly annoying marketing term (invented by "low code"/"no code" tool vendors) ...
Sounds like low code/no code "which works" - traditional low code/no code tools are in most cases too limited, or too cumbersome ...
Not sure if "real" ;-) developers should be worried, but if I were a low code/no code tool vendor I'd certainly be ...
"Low code that actually works" is a really good way to put it. That's basically the pitch, right?
The key difference I see: traditional low-code tools gave you a constrained sandbox — you could build what the tool designers anticipated, but hit a wall the moment you needed something custom. Vibe coding with a general-purpose LLM doesn't have that ceiling in the same way. You can describe anything, and it'll take a shot at it.
The flip side is that low-code tools at least enforced some guardrails. When anyone can generate arbitrary code, the failure modes are a lot more creative (and dangerous).
I think you're right that low-code vendors should be nervous. The ones that survive will probably pivot to being "AI-assisted platforms with built-in guardrails" — basically adding the safety layer that raw vibe coding doesn't have. Curious if you've seen any of them making that move already?
You're right - I think they will pivot in that direction, actually that would be obvious to do ...
I've head the mantra "XYZ will make programmers obsolete - domain experts will develop those apps themselves!" for decades, where XYZ was, through the years:
CASE tools
4GL
5GL
Low code
No code
well, it has never happened - and I've never been afraid it would happen either, because I didn't believe in it ...
But this time around it's a REALLY a different story (I had a discussion on LinkedIn with a CASE/5GL/Oracle Forms guy who didn't believe me, but he was just clearly "in denial") ...
This time around I do believe that a good deal of "basic" and especially "in house" programming work might be going away from "programmers" - domain experts are gonna do it themselves ...
The arguments around code quality and safety etc are valid, but mainly for "public facing" apps - less so for "in house" utility apps (mainly used within companies) ...
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Yeah wow, quite a different angle from most "AI coding" articles I've come across on dev.to - this sounds like "the rise of the Citizen Developer", to use a slightly annoying marketing term (invented by "low code"/"no code" tool vendors) ...
Sounds like low code/no code "which works" - traditional low code/no code tools are in most cases too limited, or too cumbersome ...
Not sure if "real" ;-) developers should be worried, but if I were a low code/no code tool vendor I'd certainly be ...
"Low code that actually works" is a really good way to put it. That's basically the pitch, right?
The key difference I see: traditional low-code tools gave you a constrained sandbox — you could build what the tool designers anticipated, but hit a wall the moment you needed something custom. Vibe coding with a general-purpose LLM doesn't have that ceiling in the same way. You can describe anything, and it'll take a shot at it.
The flip side is that low-code tools at least enforced some guardrails. When anyone can generate arbitrary code, the failure modes are a lot more creative (and dangerous).
I think you're right that low-code vendors should be nervous. The ones that survive will probably pivot to being "AI-assisted platforms with built-in guardrails" — basically adding the safety layer that raw vibe coding doesn't have. Curious if you've seen any of them making that move already?
You're right - I think they will pivot in that direction, actually that would be obvious to do ...
I've head the mantra "XYZ will make programmers obsolete - domain experts will develop those apps themselves!" for decades, where XYZ was, through the years:
CASE tools
4GL
5GL
Low code
No code
well, it has never happened - and I've never been afraid it would happen either, because I didn't believe in it ...
But this time around it's a REALLY a different story (I had a discussion on LinkedIn with a CASE/5GL/Oracle Forms guy who didn't believe me, but he was just clearly "in denial") ...
This time around I do believe that a good deal of "basic" and especially "in house" programming work might be going away from "programmers" - domain experts are gonna do it themselves ...
The arguments around code quality and safety etc are valid, but mainly for "public facing" apps - less so for "in house" utility apps (mainly used within companies) ...