We can create another function to let pipe even more readable than pipeWith with the following function:
pipe
function pipeValue(args) { return { to: (...fns) => pipe(...fns)(args) } } const array = [1,2,3,4]; pipeValue(array).to( odds, double, log );
Or use the curried pipeline where you can pass your arguments directly.
This API really resonates with me. Thanks for sharing.
Not a fan, this breaks functional composition
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
We can create another function to let
pipe
even more readable than pipeWith with the following function:Or use the curried pipeline where you can pass your arguments directly.
This API really resonates with me. Thanks for sharing.
Not a fan, this breaks functional composition