Written by Ibiyemi Adewakun✏️
The exclamation mark !
is known as the non-null assertion operator in TypeScript. We will be using these terms interchangeably in this article. But what does this operator do? In this article, we will take a look at:
- What is the TypeScript exclamation mark?
- What the exclamation mark does in TypeScript
- Popular use cases for the TypeScript exclamation mark
- The downside of using the exclamation mark in TypeScript
- Alternatives to using the TypeScript exclamation mark
What is the TypeScript exclamation mark?
The non-null assertion operator tells the TypeScript compiler that a value typed as optional cannot be null
or undefined
. For example, if we define a variable as possibly a string or undefined, the !
operator tells the compiler to ignore the possibility of it being undefined.
What the exclamation mark does in TypeScript
Let’s say a variable is defined as possibly null or undefined, like so:
let x: string | undefined
Or, let’s say a function is defined to accept an optional argument, like so:
function printString (str ?: string) { … }
In these cases, if we try to reference that variable as a definite type, then the TypeScript compiler would give us an error message, such as the following:
Object is possibly 'undefined'. ts(2532)
We can use the non-null assertion operator to tell the compiler explicitly that this variable has a value and is not null
or undefined
. Let’s review a few examples to better understand the exclamation mark in TypeScript.
Example 1: Using a variable of type string | null
for a function that accepts string
Let’s say we defined a variable word
with the type as string | null
. This means throughout our code, word
can either hold a string
value or a null
value.
If we attempt to use a function only available to string
types on word
, TypeScript will reject it because there is a possibility in our code that word
holds a null
value type:
let word : string | null = null
const num = 1
if (num) {
word = "Hello World!"
}
console.log(word.toLowerCase()) // Error: Object is possibly 'null'.ts(2531)
Using the !
non-null assertion operator, we can tell TypeScript we are certain word
will never be null
(or undefined
), so it can confidently apply string functions to it:
let word : string | null = null
const num = 1
if (num) {
word = "Hello World!"
}
console.log(word!.toLowerCase())
With this small addition, the compiler no longer believes there is a possibility that word
is null.
Example 2: Assigning the value of an optional argument to a variable within a function
In another example, let’s say we created a function printName
that accepts an optional argument personName
.
Note that defining a function argument as optional using ?:
is the same as defining type as possibly undefined. For example, arg?: string
is the same as arg: string | undefined
.
If we try to reassign that optional argument personName
to another variable of type string
, the following would occur:
function printName(personName?: string) {
const fullName: string = personName
/**
* Error: Type 'string | undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.
* Type 'undefined' is not assignable to type 'string'.
*/
console.log(`The name is ${fullName}`)
}
We can fix the TypeScript errors thrown in our snippet above using the !
operator:
function printName(personName?: string) {
const fullName: string = personName!
console.log(`The name is ${fullName}`)
}
Now, the compiler understands that personName cannot be null or undefined, making it assignable to type string
.
Example 3: Printing the attribute of an optional object argument within a function
In our final example, we will define a type Person
and a function printName
that accepts an optional argument of type Person
. Let’s see what happens if we try to use printName
to print the name attribute of Person
:
interface Person {
name: string
age: number
}
function printName(person?: Person) {
console.log(`The name is ${person.name}`) // Error: Object is possibly 'undefined'. ts(2532)
}
Let’s fix this TypeScript error using our !
operator:
interface Person {
name: string
age: number
}
function printName(person?: Person) {
console.log(`The name is ${person!.name}`)
}
Note that TypeScript has an alternative for referencing attributes and functions on objects that might be null or undefined called the optional chaining operator ?.
. For example, person?.name
or word?.toString()
will return undefined
if the variable is not defined or null.
However, the optional chaining operator ?.
cannot solve the TypeScript errors in our second example, in which we tried to assign the value of a variable type string | undefined
to a variable type string
. Learn more about optional chaining in the last section of this article.
Popular use cases for the TypeScript exclamation mark
As we’ve seen in our examples, the !
operator is very useful when we would like TypeScript to treat our variable as a solid type. This prevents us from having to handle any null or undefined cases when we are certain there is no such case.
Now that we have seen some examples to gain a better understanding of the TypeScript exclamation mark, let’s look at some popular use cases for this operator.
Performing lookups on an array
Let’s imagine we have an array of objects and we want to pick an object with a particular attribute value, like so:
interface Person {
name: string
age: number
sex: string
}
const people: Person[] = [
{
name: 'Gran',
age: 70,
sex: 'female'
},
{
name: 'Papa',
age: 72,
sex: 'male'
},
{
name: 'Mom',
age: 35,
sex: 'female'
},
{
name: 'Dad',
age: 38,
sex: 'male'
}
]
const femalePerson = people.find(p => p.sex === 'female')
In our snippet above, TypeScript will define the type of femalePerson
as Person | undefined
because it is possible that people.find
yields no result — in other words, that it will be undefined.
However, if femalePerson
has the type Person | undefined
, we will not be able to pass it as an argument to a function expecting type Person
.
When we are performing lookups on these arrays, we are often confident that they have defined values, and we therefore don’t believe any undefined cases exist. Our !
operator can save us from additional — or unnecessary — null or undefined case handling.
Add the non-null assertion operator, like so:
const femalePerson = people.find(p => p.sex === 'female')!
This would make femalePerson
have the type Person
.
React refs and event handling
React refs are used to access rendered HTML DOM nodes or React elements. Refs are created using React.createRef<HTMLDivElement>()
and then attached to the element using the ref
attribute.
To use React refs, we access the current attribute, ref.current
. Until the element is rendered, ref.current
could be null
, so it has the following type:
HTMLDivElement | null
To attach an event to ref.current
, we would first have to handle possible null
values. Here is an example:
import React from 'react'
const ToggleDisplay = () => {
const displayRef = React.createRef<HTMLDivElement>()
const toggleDisplay = () => {
if (displayRef.current) {
displayRef.current.toggleAttribute('hidden')
}
}
return (
<div>
<div class="display-panel" ref="displayRef">
<p> some content </p>
</div>
<button onClick={toggleDisplay}>Toggle Content</button>
<div>
)
}
In the snippet above, we had to handle a type check of displayRef.current
using an if
statement before calling the toggleAttribute
function.
In most cases, we are sure that if the button onClick
event is triggered, then our elements are already rendered. Therefore, there is no need for a check. This unnecessary check can be eliminated using the !
operator, like so:
const displayRef = React.createRef<HTMLDivElement>()
const toggleDisplay = () => displayRef.current!.toggleAttribute('hidden')
return (
<div>
...
The downside of using the exclamation mark in TypeScript
The !
operator does not change the runtime behavior of your code. If the value you have asserted is not null
or undefined
turns out to actually be null
or undefined
, an error will occur and disrupt the execution of your code.
Remember, the difference between TypeScript and JavaScript is the assertion of types. In JavaScript we do not need or use the !
operator because there is no type strictness.
A JavaScript variable can be instantiated with string
and changed to object
, null
, or number
during the execution of the code. This leaves it up to the developer to handle the different cases.
Using the !
operator takes away TypeScript’s “superpower” of preventing runtime type errors. Therefore, it is not the best practice to use the !
operator.
Alternatives to using the TypeScript exclamation mark
You could use optional chaining or type predicates as alternatives to non-null assertions.
Optional chaining is a TypeScript shorthand that allows us easily handle the cases where the variable is defined or not. When the variable is not defined or null, the referenced value defaults to value undefined
. Here’s an example of optional chaining:
interface Person {
name: string
age: number
sex: string
}
function printName(person?: Person): void {
console.log('The name of this person is', person?.name)
}
In our example above, if person
is undefined, our print output would be as follows:
'The name of this person is undefined'
Using type predicates in TypeScript is done by defining a function that performs a boolean test and returns a type predicate in the form arg is Type
. Here is an example:
interface Person {
name: string
age: number
sex: string
}
function validatePerson(person?: Person) person is Person {
return !!person
}
Using this type predicate, we can first validate the object before performing any further operations, like so:
function printName(person?: Person) {
if (!validatePerson(person)) {
console.log('Person is invalid')
return
}
console.log(`The name is ${person.name}`)
}
Conclusion
TypeScript’s power over JavaScript is the type safety it provides our code. However, we may sometimes want to disable TypeScript’s strict type checks — for example, for the sake of flexibility or backward compatibility. In such cases, we can use the non-null assertion operator.
Though a useful feature, I encourage you to explore safer type assertion methods instead. You can go a step further to prevent use of this operation in your project and with your team by adding the typescript-eslint
package to your project and applying the no-non-null-assertion
lint rule.
Writing a lot of TypeScript? Watch the recording of our recent TypeScript meetup to learn about writing more readable code.
TypeScript brings type safety to JavaScript. There can be a tension between type safety and readable code. Watch the recording for a deep dive on some new features of TypeScript 4.4.
Top comments (0)