Real DOMs and virtual DOMs and shadow DOMs, oh my! Let's take a dive to see how they all work together to create a clean, performant Document Objec...
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
There are three types of shadowDOM
(Userland)
open
andclosed
shadowDOM used as an option in (user) customElements (aka Web Components)and
user-agent
shadowDOM (as shown in your last screenshot) which users can not change, it is used in media elements and input/textarea elements.user-agent
shadowDOM has been around for ages in<input>
and the like, so each Browser vendor could implement their own (html5) code. That is whyinput
and friends have a different UI in different browsers.Us mortal Developers just couldn't see its content.
The "real" DOM and Userland shadowDOM are not "completely different realms".
They are all
DOM - Document Fragments
just with boundaries between them.The boundary between "real" DOM and Userland shadowDOM can be crossed by:
:part
styling (:theme
is not supported by all browsers yet)This truly represents the sentiment, Developers who have never used shadowDOM, have a strong opinion on it. I would question you can actually call them Developers then.
If I get one of those idiots in my team, I make then use a browser without shadowDOM,
in other words: NO
<input>
or<video>
tags! (its hard to type a password then...)Wow, thank you so much for this dive on the shadow DOM! I'll admit, my initial intention for this blog was to write about the differences between the real DOM and the virtual DOM. My research brought me to discover the shadow DOM, so I thought it would be cool to include it in this blog. I didn't know these in depth details about the shadow DOM, you've inspired me to research this topic further and write another blog on the mysteries of the shadow DOM. If you'd like to share any resources on the topic I'd love to include them in my research.
Also, the meme was meant to be virtual DOM 1 and virtual DOM 2 speaking to each other, but I can see how it can be thought that it's developers speaking instead. I should have labeled them for clarity. Whoops! 😅
I'd like to add a little more information about Shadow DOM use cases:
Great job with this. Love the Lion King meme at the end!
Thanks, I had a lot of fun with this one!
got some elaborate view about DOM
Thanks for this article 🙏
So cool to show how to activate options ✨
Haven't heard of shadow DOM before. Thank you for this, I learned something new today!
I'll be writing a future blog diving deeper on the mysteries of the shadow DOM, stay tuned for more! 😁
Did not know about Paint flashing or the entire rendering panel in dev tools! That will be a game changer for me, thank you!
I was really excited when I discovered this too, game changer for sure!
A great article @lyndsiwilliams. Learnt a new think: Shadow DOM. Thanks !!
Thank you!
very good article.
I want give you (Lyndsi, and Danny) 100 thumbs up
I still don't understand those two sentences.
I am very confused with them.
If anyone explains it in more detail with references, I'd be appreciate
Its more that the number of DOM updates you make can become a problem in large applications that have a lot of DOM nodes, because they all have to be redrawn. The virtual DOM is basically a convenience tool that let's you batch your DOM updates, so the browser only has to redraw once on every state change cycle.
Thanks for your reply.
So, they are all about reflow/repaint.
In React's virtual Dom, All the updates are applied to real DOM using DocumentFragment once. is that right?