Coding is as much a matter of personal growth as it is of logic and control-flow. I keep patience, curiosity, & exuberance in the same toolbox as vim and git.
*Opinions posted are my own*
I have other doubt it would not have been better to put the template in a method of the Header class, which returns the element in question, especially to have an order, do it as it is now does not give me any help to organize the code. And it's as if it was the same code of all life, even worse because it puts it in a shadow, to which I guarantee you Google doesn't have access.
Coding is as much a matter of personal growth as it is of logic and control-flow. I keep patience, curiosity, & exuberance in the same toolbox as vim and git.
*Opinions posted are my own*
a shadow, to which I guarantee you Google doesn't have access.
I wouldn't take that guarantee. Google search absolutely, 100%, without a doubt DOES read content in shadow DOM. Bing as well.
I have other doubt it would not have been better to put the template in a method of the Header class
If you're using a <template> element, then the template should either be in module scope or a static member of the class. If you make it an instance field or method, you will lose the performance benefit of only parsing the HTML once.
And this is in fact how FASTElement does it. LitElement however lets you define a render method on the instance, which will perhaps be more suitable for you.
Ok - Google reads and executes js, but Bing and other crawlers mostly not, so as i really want this to be prod solution i think it is just a cool experiment or usable only if website or app will have traffic ONLY from google (and this is far from reality).
Coding is as much a matter of personal growth as it is of logic and control-flow. I keep patience, curiosity, & exuberance in the same toolbox as vim and git.
*Opinions posted are my own*
Executing js is not the same as reading content corectly - i don't remember where, but i saw tests and bing readed component, but without semantic - if i'm incorrect about this, someone please correct me.
Would be nice if you show here tests with all the biggest search engines showing, this method is not impacting seo at all.
Thanks in advance.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
And what about SEO? Funny as it is but not practical in real life.
Google executes JavaScript and has no problem parsing your content even if it's in shadow DOM.
But you don't have to put your content in shadow root, in fact, for many applications, it's better to keep content in the light DOM of the document.
Example? I ask this to see if there is anything special to do when you are not using shadow
I have other doubt it would not have been better to put the template in a method of the Header class, which returns the element in question, especially to have an order, do it as it is now does not give me any help to organize the code. And it's as if it was the same code of all life, even worse because it puts it in a shadow, to which I guarantee you Google doesn't have access.
I wouldn't take that guarantee. Google search absolutely, 100%, without a doubt DOES read content in shadow DOM. Bing as well.
If you're using a
<template>element, then the template should either be in module scope or a static member of the class. If you make it an instance field or method, you will lose the performance benefit of only parsing the HTML once.And this is in fact how FASTElement does it. LitElement however lets you define a
rendermethod on the instance, which will perhaps be more suitable for you.Ok - Google reads and executes js, but Bing and other crawlers mostly not, so as i really want this to be prod solution i think it is just a cool experiment or usable only if website or app will have traffic ONLY from google (and this is far from reality).
Bing executes JS. Bing crawls shadow DOM content, just like Google does.
Executing js is not the same as reading content corectly - i don't remember where, but i saw tests and bing readed component, but without semantic - if i'm incorrect about this, someone please correct me.
Would be nice if you show here tests with all the biggest search engines showing, this method is not impacting seo at all.
Thanks in advance.