Introduction
Angular is a powerful front-end framework for building dynamic, single-page applications (SPAs). However, when it comes to deploying an Angular application, many developers default to using an EC2 instance. While EC2 can work, it is not the most efficient solution for deploying static frontend applications. Instead, using AWS S3 + CloudFront is a better and more cost-effective alternative. In this post, we’ll explore why and how to deploy Angular efficiently.
Why is Angular a Static Frontend Application?
Angular applications, once built, consist of static files:
HTML (Structure of the app)
CSS (Styling and layouts)
JavaScript (Compiled from TypeScript, providing interactivity)
Unlike traditional server-side applications, Angular does not require backend rendering. The frontend makes API calls to fetch data from a REST or GraphQL backend, which can be hosted separately. Because of this, an Angular app does not need a dedicated server like an EC2 instance to function—it just needs to be served as static files.
Why S3 + CloudFront is the Best Deployment Option
Since Angular applications are static, AWS S3 (Simple Storage Service) with CloudFront (CDN) offers several advantages:
✅ Cost-Effective
Running an EC2 instance 24/7 incurs costs for compute power, storage, and maintenance. S3 storage costs are much lower, and you only pay for what you use.
✅ Scalability
S3 automatically scales to handle any number of users, whereas EC2 requires manual scaling and load balancing.
✅ Faster Performance with CloudFront
CloudFront, AWS’s Content Delivery Network (CDN), caches static files globally, reducing latency and improving load times for users worldwide.
✅ No Server Maintenance
With S3, there’s no need to configure or maintain a server (like Nginx or Apache) since AWS handles everything for you.
How to Deploy an Angular App on S3 + CloudFront
Step 1: Build Your Angular Application
Run the following command to generate a production-ready build:
ng build --configuration=production
This will create a dist/ folder containing static files.
Step 2: Upload Files to an S3 Bucket
Create an S3 bucket and upload the contents of the dist/ folder:
aws s3 sync dist/my-app s3://my-angular-app-bucket --acl public-read
Enable Static Website Hosting in the S3 bucket settings.
Step 3: Set Up CloudFront for Faster Delivery
Create a CloudFront distribution pointing to your S3 bucket.
Enable caching and compression for better performance.
Use a custom domain (optional) and enable HTTPS for security.
Now, your Angular app is globally available with low latency and high scalability!
Why EC2 is Not the Best Choice for Static Angular Apps
If you still choose to deploy Angular on EC2, you must use a web server like Nginx, Apache, or Express because EC2 alone does not serve static files. Here’s why EC2 is not ideal:
❌ Higher Cost
EC2 instances charge for compute time, storage, and bandwidth.
Requires a load balancer for high-traffic apps.
❌ Manual Scaling Required
You need to set up auto-scaling and load balancing.
Server maintenance is required (updates, security patches, etc.).
❌ No Built-in Global Distribution
Unlike CloudFront, EC2 does not provide automatic global caching.
How to Deploy Angular on EC2 with Nginx
If you must use EC2, follow these steps to serve Angular properly:
Step 1: Install Nginx
sudo apt update
sudo apt install nginx -y
Step 2: Copy Angular Build Files
sudo cp -r dist/my-app/* /var/www/html/
Step 3: Restart Nginx
sudo systemctl restart nginx
Your Angular app is now accessible via the EC2 instance’s public IP.
When to Use S3 + CloudFront?
✔️ You only need to serve an Angular frontend.
✔️ You want a scalable and cost-effective solution.
✔️ You don’t want to manage servers.
When to Use EC2?
✔️ You need to host both the Angular frontend and the backend API on the same instance.
✔️ Your application requires dynamic server-side rendering.
✔️ You need more control over server configurations.
Conclusion
For deploying an Angular SPA, S3 + CloudFront is the best choice due to its low cost, high scalability, and ease of maintenance. However, if you need full server control or want to deploy a backend on the same instance, EC2 with Nginx is an option.
Which method do you prefer for your Angular deployments? Let me know in the comments! 🚀
Top comments (0)