DEV Community

Cover image for # Choosing React Design Patterns by Project Size
Md Enayetur Rahman
Md Enayetur Rahman

Posted on

# Choosing React Design Patterns by Project Size

Modern React development offers a toolbox of design patterns—but not every pattern is worth its weight in every code‑base. In smaller apps you win by staying lightweight; in enterprise‑scale products you can’t survive without architectural patterns that coordinate dozens of teams. This guide maps 16 popular patterns from *Learning Patterns* to three common project sizes so you can pick the right tool for the right moment.


1. Small Projects — “One‑dev / One‑feature” size

Why keep it simple?

Small apps (≤ 5 components, a single bundle) need the fewest abstractions. Hooks, ES modules and singletons already cover reuse, state and configuration; anything deeper adds friction.

Patterns worth using

Pattern How it works Why useful in tiny apps
Hooks useState, useEffect, custom hooks share stateful logic inside functional components. Replaces HOCs/Render‑props, no wrapper hell 
Module Each file exports public members; private helpers stay hidden. Encapsulation prevents global leaks without extra layers 
Factory Returns a component/service variant based on params. Generate small themed widgets or API clients on demand 
Singleton One global instance accessed via import. Ideal for analytics SDK, event‑bus with minimal boilerplate 
Provider (Context) <ThemeProvider> supplies values to the tree, consumed with useContext. Eliminates prop‑drilling for theme or locale 

10 Typical Small‑size Projects

  1. Personal portfolio site
  2. Weather widget SPA
  3. Markdown notes app
  4. Pomodoro timer
  5. Todo‑list with localStorage
  6. Single‑page landing page with form
  7. Image gallery viewer
  8. QR‑code generator
  9. Unit‑converter tool
  10. Countdown timer for events

Small‑project take‑away

Lean on Hooks + Modules first; add Provider or Singleton only when two+ components need the same data.


2. Medium Projects — “Feature‑team / Shared library” size

Why patterns matter here

With tens of components and several developers, you’re coordinating data flow, code reuse and cross‑cutting concerns. Patterns that separate view from data and formalise side effects pay off.

Patterns that shine

Pattern How it works Medium‑scale benefit
Provider Context providers hold auth, theme, feature flags. Central source of truth across pages 
Container / Presentational Containers fetch data, hand it to dumb UI components. Keeps UI reusable, eases testing 
Compound Components Parent shares internal context with children (e.g. Tabs). Build cohesive, flexible widgets.
Observer Observable streams notify subscribers; consumed via hooks. Live updates from sockets, RxJS 
Proxy Wrapper intercepts calls to API / storage. Inject headers, logging, caching in one place 
Command Encapsulates an action with execute/undo. Enables undo/redo, time‑travel debugging 

10 Typical Medium‑size Projects

  1. Blogging platform with admin panel
  2. E‑commerce dashboard
  3. Multi‑step form wizard with autosave
  4. SaaS analytics portal
  5. Internal CRM for small team
  6. Real‑time chat app
  7. Kanban board like Trello clone
  8. Learning‑management system module
  9. Company wiki / knowledge‑base
  10. Video streaming dashboard with user roles

Medium‑project take‑away

As features grow, explicit boundaries (Provider, Containers) and event‑driven patterns (Observer, Command) keep complexity readable.


3. Large Projects — “Multi‑squad / Multi‑year” scale

Why you need architecture

Enterprise apps juggle thousands of components, micro‑front‑ends, and real‑time data. Performance and team isolation become existential.

Heavy‑hitters

Pattern How it works Large‑scale strength
Mediator / Middleware Central object (Redux middleware, service bus) routes messages. Decouples features, enforces policies 
Flyweight Shares immutable data between many similar objects (virtual lists). Cuts memory & re‑render costs in huge datasets 
Proxy Same as medium, but now adds retries, circuit‑breakers. Gate‑keeps unstable backends 
Observer Streams power notifications, analytics, collaborative cursors. Scale to millions of updates without prop‑drilling
Factory Generates per‑tenant themes / API clients for white‑label apps. Supports SaaS multi‑tenant configs 
Singleton One expensive WebGL renderer or analytics client per app shell. Prevents duplicate heavy resources 
Provider Shared auth/theme for micro‑front‑ends. Keeps UX consistent across teams 
Command Action objects stored in history stack. Enables full audit log & branching undo 

10 Typical Large‑size Projects

  1. Enterprise resource‑planning (ERP) suite
  2. Global e‑commerce marketplace
  3. Real‑time collaborative document editor
  4. Cloud management console (AWS‑like)
  5. Social media platform
  6. Banking dashboard with live market feeds
  7. Healthcare electronic records portal
  8. Multi‑tenant SaaS CRM
  9. Streaming analytics monitoring (IoT)
  10. Omnichannel contact‑center UI

Large‑project take‑away

Architecture patterns (Mediator, Flyweight) prevent both runtime meltdown and organisational gridlock; combine with Providers and Factories to standardise shared behaviour.


Final Thoughts

Start as simple as you can and scale patterns only when pain appears. Hooks and Modules cover most microscopic apps. As a team grows, adopt Providers, Containers and event‑driven patterns. Once multiple squads ship in the same bundle, treat patterns like Mediator or Flyweight as non‑negotiable infrastructure. Choose patterns for today’s size, but keep tomorrow’s scale in mind.

Top comments (0)