Nice list :)
I'd just say on Tip 7: [1,5,7].includes(x) is neater as there's no magic -1 (and it's shorter)
[1,5,7].includes(x)
Tip 8: can work, but functions with few parameters can benefit from not having to force names on the user.
Thanks for your feedback
Some comments have been hidden by the post's author - find out more
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Nice list :)
I'd just say on Tip 7:
[1,5,7].includes(x)is neater as there's no magic -1 (and it's shorter)Tip 8: can work, but functions with few parameters can benefit from not having to force names on the user.
Thanks for your feedback