Might be better to have implicit conversion from string/int to the property type, but not from the property type back.
Maybe I didnt get it right but if you do that you won't get type checking anymore. Because then a string can convert to a Name or a FirstName.
Yes it can, but you can just as easily pass the wrong string value to your constructor.
It's not string to FirstName you are trying to prevent, it is FirstName to LastName.
Are you sure you want to hide this comment? It will become hidden in your post, but will still be visible via the comment's permalink.
Hide child comments as well
Confirm
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
We're a place where coders share, stay up-to-date and grow their careers.
Might be better to have implicit conversion from string/int to the property type, but not from the property type back.
Maybe I didnt get it right but if you do that you won't get type checking anymore.
Because then a string can convert to a Name or a FirstName.
Yes it can, but you can just as easily pass the wrong string value to your constructor.
It's not string to FirstName you are trying to prevent, it is FirstName to LastName.