Most posts about Leonardo AI frame it as "the free Midjourney alternative." That undersells it. Two features make it worth using on its own merits, paid tier or not:
Direct PBR texture generation. There's a dedicated 3D Texture Generation tool that outputs albedo, normal, and roughness maps from a text prompt — no Substance Painter, no procedural setup. It's weak on complex organic surfaces (skin, fur) and very regular geometric patterns (brick, tile), but strong on worn/irregular surfaces: stone, wood, rust, aged paint — which covers most environment art. A prompt like "rough weathered wooden planks with metal corner reinforcements" gets you a usable map set in a couple of minutes. Enable "Make Seamless" before generating or you'll get visible tiling seams in-engine.
LoRA training for character consistency. 10-20 reference images, same character, consistent lighting and angles, no busy backgrounds. Upload through Training & Datasets, pick a base model (Phoenix or Diffusion XL), train — takes 20-40 minutes on their servers. After that, every generation with that character's name in the prompt holds the same design without re-explaining it every time. Available from the $12/month Apprentice tier up.
Free tier is 150 tokens/day, resets daily — enough for 25-35 standard generations. The catch: free generations are public. If your project's visuals are confidential, you need a paid tier for private generation.
Full breakdown with the exact settings (guidance scale, negative prompts, seamless tiling fix) and a Leonardo-vs-Midjourney comparison table: https://digitaltoolify.blogspot.com/2026/07/how-to-use-leonardo-ai-for-game.html
Curious if anyone's tried the texture generation against a proper Substance workflow — how close is it really?
Top comments (0)