Express is a fast, unopinionated, minimalist web framework for Node.js - docs
Error handling is a routine that one can not do without while buil...
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
Hello,
I really like this post as I'm learning a better way of handling errors.
I have a question about when you add in the
.catch(err) { next(err) }
Is this actually throwing out an error from server or I should still use like you did before
throw new ErrorHandler(500, 'Internal server error');
Or that
next(err)
is doing it?I just not get that and I would like to understand it.
I have an example of how I used:
Since getAll is a middleware, it must call next() to tell the server to continue processing the next step after that, or else it will be blocked and never return any responses to the client. The error thrown in try block is then caught in catch block, through the name of err.
Therefore, calling next(err) means passing err to the next error-handling middleware while keeping the flow of your app running.
Great Article, Thanks
btw, I got a small question in this own Error class :
Why we have to write like this (1)
but not like this (2)
?
Actually, I wrote like (2) and then my own class lost a
message
propertyIt only comes back when I change it to (1).
What is the difference between them ?
Thanks,
The super() method is used when a class (child) inherits from another class (parent).
The super() method provides a means of syncing the child's constructor to the parent's constructor.
Let me illustrate with an example
FooNow, looking at the code above,
requires a
nameto be passed to its constructor in order to function, when
Barinherited from
Foo, there's no way the
namecould be passed down to
Fooif not with the
super()`So, in relation to the snippet that you shared above, you are passing the message to the parent which in this case is
Error
, that way the childErrorHandler
has no access tomessage
I hope this helps.
Is there a necessity in
Bar
constructor at all?You just pass the same
Test
value to the parent class ultimately. In this casethere is no need to a constructor at all I assume and Eslint should also hint about it.
The best error handling mechanism I've seen so far. I have a question though.
I understand that i have to require this in the index file:
Will I have to include this code
in every file where I need to handle errors apart from the index file?
It's like any other module, you will have to require/import it anywhere you need to use it. No specific exceptions, it depends on the use case.
Thank you so much
Hi Chinedu,
Thank you very much for your post! This is what I've been wanting to implement, but somehow I couldn't figure out a simple way.
I adapted it a little bit to my code but applied the same principle you are describing.
Again, thanks man!
Cheers!
Great post. Buddy. Just got one question here.
This is cool,
Just one opinion, i feel it should be expanded to be not just Error Handler but statusHandler
```
class statusHandler extends Error {
constructor(statusCode, message, data) {
super();
this.statusCode = statusCode;
this.message = message;
this.data = data || null
}
}
module.exports = {
statusHandler
}
Just like Express is unopinionated, how you apply the concept in the article is also unopinionated. And except I do not understand you clearly, it'd not make sense semantically to throw a success response as an error. Thanks for sharing your views.
Thanks for a useful post. One question on usage of validateUser method. How do we use that method in lets say any PUT path that validates a user?
Simply calling validateUser(req, res, next) is causing the error Error [ERR_HTTP_HEADERS_SENT]: Cannot set headers after they are sent to the client in the code below validateUser call that assumes the user is already validated.
I am guessing this is happening because express does not immediate terminates the request processing after the response has been sent to the client.
I think your guess is right. Sometimes it happens if a return statement is skipped somewhere, so the execution continues after the first error encounter
Hi and thanks for this article, I have tried to implement it and instead of having the errorMiddleware called when I
throw new ErrorHandler(500)
within my route, I have in the console:(node:16482) UnhandledPromiseRejectionWarning: Error: Server Error
what part did I miss? thanksThank you for the article, I learned something.
I have question, how does Express know that next(error), should be passed to the Error Handling middleware (which has 4 arguments)?
If there is a middleware that has (res, req, next) that was sat up before the Error Handling middleware, will it get first to handle the error?
Nasser
This happens because even if you do not configure a middleware for error handling, express does it internally for you, so when an error occurs, all subsequent middlewares are skipped until the error handling middleware. How does express know what this middleware is? Because it has four arguments, error, req, res, next.
Just what I was looking for, I'm learning Express.
Just one doubt, what in case of, for example, a database error? Which is no enclosed by an if statement and there is no error throw for it. Therefore the express error middleware is called and ErrorHandler object is instantiated with code and message set to undefined.
The solution I propose is to add an if statement in the ErrorHandler constructor to check if the given values are undefined. Let know your opinion and if I'm wrong.
Hi, This is an awesome article. I just have one problem. I implemented it, but whenever I use this throw error, my server crashes with error
throw er; // Unhandled 'error' event
. What did I do wrong ? Could you please help me ?Thank you. It's really helpful
what about global error? you code din't handle global error?
exactly what i was thinking. I feel like all uncaught exceptions won't be created as a custom Error
This is great, thank you! Exactly what I needed.
Glad to learn you found it helpful. ✌️
This is some good stuff, mate
Thanks Chief
Thanks for the article Orie, it really help me a lot.
This is it, chief. This is exactly what I'm looking.
I've been trying to figure out to make our back-end code cleaner and I think this post has answered all of my questions.
Thank you and take care!
Glad to hear that you found it helpful
Awesome Awesome stuff....
Thanks!
Maybe
super(message)
instead of justsuper()
?ReferenceError: ErrorHandler is not defined
const { handleError, ErrorHandler } = require('./helpers/error')
Imported ErrorHandler but not used into Index file.
Why for a success case the last step is next(), but not a return res.status(200)?
It's because, the function is a middleware, not a final destination, with next() returned, it would proceed to the next code to be executed.
It's a really nice content, thank you for the help!!
Hey Chinedu, thank you for this article. I have a question on Testing.
How do you actually test the: "next(error)" I am using nest and I am having a hard time capturing that.
Thank you.
Nice Article
Can we make common structure for Error & Success both ?
Thank you so much for this article! it was very clear and well explained each step of the way. Very helpful!
Hello, nice post. If I use express-validation, how could I throw my custom error class from express-validation? Thank you.