DEV Community

Cover image for Google SWE VO Interview Experience | Passed in 2 Rounds (Mar 16)
net programhelp
net programhelp

Posted on

Google SWE VO Interview Experience | Passed in 2 Rounds (Mar 16)

Just wrapped up my Google SWE Virtual Onsite (VO) with two rounds and successfully got the offer! Everything felt smooth and efficient — both interviewers were friendly, and the process was very well-structured. Here’s a detailed breakdown of the questions, solutions, and key takeaways to help those preparing for Big Tech interviews.

Round 1: India-based Interviewer (Friendly & Straightforward)

We started with a quick background discussion and jumped directly into technical questions. The focus was on resource allocation algorithms, especially interval overlap handling, edge cases, and clean implementation.

Coding Question: Car Rental Capacity Planning

Problem:
Given all rental orders from last year (pickup and return times), determine the minimum number of cars needed to satisfy all requests. Also provide a valid allocation plan.

Solution Approach

  • Convert each booking into two events: pickup (+1) and return (-1)
  • Sort all events by time; if timestamps are equal, process return first
  • Use a sweep line approach to track active rentals
  • The peak number of concurrent rentals = minimum cars required

For allocation:

  • Maintain a pool of available cars
  • Assign a car on pickup, release it on return
  • Key edge case: if return time ≤ next pickup time, reuse the car

Complexity: O(n log n) time (sorting), O(n) space

The interviewer was satisfied with both the logic and implementation. Edge cases were discussed thoroughly, which made a strong impression.

Round 2: US-based Interviewer (Very Conversational)

This round felt more like a collaborative discussion. We started with behavioral questions, followed by two coding problems.

Behavioral Questions (Use STAR Method)

  • Describe a time you convinced your team to adopt your technical solution
  • Talk about a situation where you identified and resolved a technical risk

The interviewer asked follow-up questions, so clarity and real project experience mattered a lot.

Coding Question 1: Maximum Product Subarray

Key Insight: Negative numbers can flip the result, so we must track both max and min.

  • Maintain curMax and curMin
  • At each step, compare:
    • current number
    • curMax × current
    • curMin × current
  • Update global maximum accordingly

Coding Question 2: Convert BST to Circular Doubly Linked List

  • Use in-order traversal (sorted order)
  • Maintain a pointer to the previous node
  • Link current node with previous node bidirectionally
  • After traversal, connect head and tail to form a cycle

Follow-ups:

  • How to track node positions
  • How to implement without modifying original structure
  • How to convert to descending order (reverse in-order traversal)

Final Thoughts & Tips

Clearing Google VO is not just about solving problems — it's about:

  • Clear communication
  • Handling edge cases
  • Writing clean, bug-free code
  • Thinking through follow-ups logically

Honestly, what made a big difference for me was having structured guidance during preparation. If you often get stuck midway, miss edge cases, or struggle with follow-ups, getting real-time feedback can significantly improve your performance.

If you're preparing for Google, Meta, or other Big Tech interviews, you can check out programhelp — they provide real-time interview guidance, mock interviews, and expert support to help you refine your approach and avoid common pitfalls.

Good luck to everyone grinding for Big Tech — hope you all land your dream offers!

Top comments (0)