Recently completed the Snowflake 2026 Online Assessment. Format: 120 minutes, 3 problems. Difficulty: consistently mid+ to hard. No warm-up, no “free points”. Core focus: modeling ability, DP design, and optimization thinking.
If you move slightly slower than expected, time pressure becomes very real. This OA is less about syntax and more about whether you can recognize the underlying model fast.
1️⃣ String Patterns
Problem Summary
Given a string length wordLen, with at most maxVowels consecutive vowels allowed,
count the number of valid strings. Return result modulo 1e9+7.
Core Model: Dynamic Programming
Define state:
dp[i][j] = number of strings of length i
ending with j consecutive vowels
Transition logic:
- If adding a consonant → consecutive vowel count resets to 0
- If adding a vowel → j increases by 1 (must ensure j ≤ maxVowels)
Final answer:
sum(dp[wordLen][j]) for all valid j
This is a classic constrained counting DP. The tricky part isn’t coding — it’s defining the state correctly. If your state design is off, you’ll burn 20+ minutes debugging transitions.
2️⃣ Paint the Ceiling
Problem Summary
Generate an array of side lengths using a formula. Choose two sides (x ≤ y) such that:
x * y ≤ a
Count the number of valid pairs.
Core Model: Two Pointers
After sorting:
- If S[left] * S[right] ≤ a → current left contributes (right - left + 1) pairs
- Else → move right pointer left
Key pitfalls:
- Brute force O(n²) will time out
- Multiplication overflow handling
- Careful boundary movement
This one tests whether you recognize a monotonic structure quickly.
3️⃣ Task Scheduling
This is the most modeling-heavy problem in the entire set.
Key Insight
Assigning a task to a paid server effectively covers:
time[i] + 1 tasks
So the problem becomes:
0/1 Knapsack – Minimum Cost Coverage
dp[j] = minimum cost to cover j tasks Item value = time[i] + 1 Item cost = cost[i]
Goal:
min(dp[j]) where j ≥ n
This is not a typical “maximize value” knapsack — it’s a minimum-cost coverage variant. If you don’t reframe it properly, it’s easy to go down the wrong path.
Overall Evaluation
- No easy entry problem
- Strong emphasis on modeling
- Time pressure is real
- Optimization thinking required
If you mainly practice standard pattern questions, this OA will feel noticeably harder. It rewards structural recognition over brute implementation.
Preparing for Top Tech OA Rounds
We continuously track real OA and VO structures across major tech companies, analyze pattern frequency, and simulate full-length timed environments.
If you want access to structured prep and OA assistance, feel free to reach out. Strong preparation makes timing pressure manageable — and that’s often the real difference maker.
Top comments (0)