DEV Community

Cover image for TikTok SDE OA New Question Practice | 18 minutes to AC four questions, successfully passed VO
net programhelp
net programhelp

Posted on

TikTok SDE OA New Question Practice | 18 minutes to AC four questions, successfully passed VO

I just wrapped up the TikTok SDE Online Assessment and wanted to share a fresh, first-hand experience along with detailed solution strategies for every question. Even better — I’ve already received the VO invitation shortly after submitting, so hopefully this helps you avoid common pitfalls and move through the OA with confidence.

Quick good news first: although this OA included new questions, the overall difficulty was surprisingly friendly. If you’ve practiced a reasonable number of algorithm problems, this set should feel very manageable. I didn’t hit any major blockers — all four problems were read, coded, and accepted within about 18 minutes. The submission process was smooth, and the VO invite arrived soon after, which should reassure anyone currently preparing.

Below is a structured breakdown of each problem, including core concepts, solution logic, complexity, and key pitfalls. Even newer candidates should be able to follow these approaches and pass without grinding overly difficult problems.

T1: Adjacent Character Dedup Count (Simple Simulation)

Core Concepts: String traversal, case normalization

Solution Idea: This is essentially a giveaway problem. Traverse the string once and compare adjacent characters while ignoring case sensitivity.

Normalize each character to lowercase (or uppercase — consistency is what matters). As you iterate from left to right, compare each normalized character with the previous one. If they differ, increment a counter. After the traversal completes, the counter represents the final answer.

Complexity: O(n). Only one pass through the string is required, with no additional heavy operations.

Pitfall to Avoid: Forgetting case normalization can cause incorrect comparisons — for example, 'a' and 'A' should be treated as identical.

T2: Departure Time Lookup (Binary Search / Linear Scan)

Core Concepts: Time conversion, searching in a sorted array

Solution Idea: You’re given sorted departure times (HH:MM) and a current time. The goal is to find the difference in minutes between the current time and the most recent departure. If every departure is later than the current time, return -1.

Step one is standardization: convert all times into total minutes since 00:00. For example, 08:30 becomes 8×60+30 = 510. This removes the need for hour/minute handling and allows direct integer comparisons.

Step two is the search. Because the array is sorted, binary search is optimal. Locate the first time greater than or equal to the current time; the element immediately before it is the latest valid departure. If the index is 0, no valid departure exists — return -1. Otherwise, subtract the departure minutes from the current minutes.

Complexity: O(log n) with binary search. A linear scan (O(n)) is also acceptable given relaxed constraints.

Pitfall to Avoid: Be careful during conversion — 23:59 equals 23×60+59 = 1439 minutes.

T3: Matrix Command Simulation (Rotate + Reverse)

Core Concepts: Matrix manipulation, command simulation

Solution Idea: You’re given a matrix and a sequence of commands such as rotating 90 degrees, reversing rows, or reversing columns. Execute them in order and output the final matrix.

This is a simulation-heavy problem — no advanced algorithms required, just careful implementation.

90° Rotation: The only formula worth memorizing. For an n×n matrix:

new[i][j] = original[n-1-j][i]

Avoid in-place rotation unless you’re extremely comfortable with element swaps; allocating a new matrix is safer and fast enough.

Row / Column Reversal: Use the classic two-pointer swap. Reverse each row independently, and apply the same logic column-wise.

The problem typically provides valid indices, so heavy boundary checking is unnecessary — just execute commands as given.

Complexity: O(commands × matrix size). Constraints are small enough that this easily passes.

T4: Paint Updates with Adjacent Pair Tracking (Dynamic Maintenance)

Core Concepts: Incremental updates, neighbor contribution tracking

Solution Idea: You start with a color array and perform multiple repaint operations. After each update, return the number of adjacent pairs sharing the same color.

The key is dynamic maintenance. Recounting the entire array after every update is inefficient. Instead, maintain a running total and only adjust contributions around the modified index.

Workflow:

1. Initialize by scanning once to count existing adjacent matches.

2. For each repaint at index i:

  • If the new color equals the old one, nothing changes.
  • Otherwise, subtract contributions from (i-1, i) and (i, i+1) created by the old color.
  • Update the color.
  • Add new contributions formed with neighbors.
  • Record the updated total.

Complexity: O(q). Each query touches at most two neighbors, making it extremely efficient.

Pitfall to Avoid: Handle edges carefully — index 0 only checks the right neighbor, and n-1 only checks the left.

OA Wrap-Up + VO Tips

If you’re preparing for TikTok interviews, having the right materials can dramatically shorten your prep cycle. ProgramHelp provides full-process TikTok SDE interview resources — including past OA questions, newly observed problem patterns, high-frequency algorithm collections, and focused VO technical guidance — helping candidates study smarter instead of blindly grinding problems.

Whether you’re just starting OA prep or already gearing up for VO rounds, structured guidance can make a major difference.

You can learn more or reach out here:

https://programhelp.net/en/contact/

Top comments (0)