π Looking for the full toolkit? This is a focused workflow guide. See the complete Regulatory & Compliance Data Tools hub for every actor in this category.
For compliance teams, risk desks, and anyone doing counterparty due diligence across Asia-Pacific, enforcement actions are a critical signal β a fine, a ban, a censure, or a license revocation from a regulator tells you something the financial statements wonβt. The problem: every regulator publishes enforcement separately, in its own format, on its own site. This guide shows how to consolidate APAC (and adjacent) enforcement into one structured, monitorable feed.
Table of Contents
Toggle
- The enforcement sources
- The monitoring workflow
- What you can build with it
- Why automate instead of checking regulator sites
- FAQ
- Get started
The enforcement sources
- FINMA / MAS / SFC Enforcement Tracker β enforcement actions from Switzerland (FINMA), Singapore (MAS), and Hong Kong (SFC) in one actor.
- Singapore MAS Enforcement β MAS enforcement actions and penalties.
- Hong Kong SFC Enforcement Tracker β SFC disciplinary actions, fines, and bans.
- Australia ASIC Enforcement β ASIC enforcement and regulatory actions.
- India SEBI Filings Tracker β SEBI orders and regulatory filings.
- Regulatory Filings MCP β expose regulatory/enforcement lookups directly to an AI agent.
Expanding: Korea (FSS), Japan (FSA/SESC), and Taiwan (FSC) enforcement actors are in development and will join this workflow as released.
The monitoring workflow
Step 1 β consolidate the feeds
Run the enforcement actors and normalize their output into one table keyed by regulator, entity, action_type, date, penalty, and source_url. The FINMA/MAS/SFC tracker already covers three regulators in one call.
Step 2 β schedule it
Enforcement is published irregularly; a daily scheduled run means you catch new actions within a day rather than discovering them in a quarterly review.
Step 3 β match against your entities
Cross-reference the enforcement feed against your client list, counterparties, or portfolio so an action against a relevant entity raises an alert automatically.
What you can build with it
- KYC / counterparty screen β check whether a counterparty or its principals have APAC enforcement history before onboarding.
- Ongoing compliance monitor β a daily feed of new enforcement actions across the regulators you care about, matched to your book.
- Risk & news desk β surface regulator actions as an early risk signal alongside disclosures and filings.
Why automate instead of checking regulator sites
Each regulatorβs site is checkable by hand β but a consolidated, daily, structured, entity-matched feed across five-plus regulators is not a manual job. Pulling it as data lets you monitor continuously and wire alerts into your own systems, pay-per-result, with no enterprise compliance-data contract.
FAQ
Which regulators are covered? Singapore (MAS), Hong Kong (SFC), Australia (ASIC), India (SEBI), and Switzerland (FINMA) today, with Korea, Japan, and Taiwan in development.
Can I monitor several regulators in one feed? Yes β the FINMA/MAS/SFC tracker covers three in one actor, and all return a common structured shape you can merge into a single feed.
How fresh is the data? Each actor pulls live from the regulator at run time; schedule it daily for near-real-time alerts.
What does it cost? Pay-per-event on Apify β per result, no subscription or seat fee.
Get started
Start with the FINMA / MAS / SFC Enforcement Tracker, or see the broader APAC Business Intelligence guide.
See also: New βSingapore MAS Financial Institutions Directory
Top comments (0)